London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Friday, Jan 23, 2026

Government Disability Benefit Cuts May Increase Local Authority and NHS Costs

Government Disability Benefit Cuts May Increase Local Authority and NHS Costs

Proposed reductions in disability benefits could burden councils and the NHS with significant additional expenses.
The UK government's proposal to cut at least £5 billion from disability benefits could result in substantial additional costs for local councils and the National Health Service (NHS), according to local government officials and advocacy groups.

The recent green paper released by Work and Pensions Secretary Liz Kendall outlines potential changes that could render up to 1.2 million individuals ineligible for the Personal Independence Payment (PIP) by the year 2029/30. These changes may affect existing claimants, leading to the loss of benefits during reassessments.

Critics of the proposed cuts highlight that the reduction or elimination of PIP support could lead to worsening physical or mental health conditions for affected individuals.

This could subsequently increase reliance on council-funded care services.

Furthermore, family members serving as unpaid carers may lose access to carer’s allowance benefits, potentially necessitating their transfer of care responsibilities to local authorities.

An analysis conducted by the Disability Policy Centre projects that the anticipated cuts could generate an additional £1.2 billion in costs for NHS and social care services.

Arun Veerappan, the interim director of research at the Disability Policy Centre, noted that for every pound lost in benefits, councils might need to expend around £1.50 to address resultant shortfalls.

He addressed concerns about the adequacy of resources available to meet increased demand for social care support, emphasizing that funding and administrative challenges would exacerbate difficulties in sourcing appropriate care providers.

The targeted cuts are expected to affect individuals whose PIP claims involve a range of disabilities or illnesses, rather than narrowly defined severe conditions.

Often, the 'daily living' or 'care' elements of PIP payments are utilized by councils to subsidize their care services.

A reduction in these payments would place an increased financial burden on local governments.

David Fothergill, chair of the Local Government Association’s community wellbeing board, remarked that a decrease in PIP payments might lead to lower individual financial contributions to care, consequently increasing the financial responsibility of local councils.

The Local Government Association is currently exploring the potential impact of welfare reforms on the adult social care charging system.

Jon Abrams from Inclusion London, an organization representing disabled individuals, argued that the proposed changes would disproportionately affect disabled people reliant on social care.

He described the government's approach as detrimental, suggesting that it exacerbates the existing challenges faced by the social care system while potentially increasing long-term costs for local authorities and NHS services.

Concerns have also been raised that the proposed measures may compel many disabled individuals and their caregivers to withdraw from accessing necessary care services, thereby exerting additional pressure on the broader health system.

In response, a spokesperson for the Department for Work and Pensions stated that the current social security system is inadequate and has committed to implementing a £1 billion support package aimed at helping disabled individuals secure employment and overcome barriers to work.

The spokesperson stressed the government's dedication to maintaining assistance for individuals with severe health conditions and indicated plans to introduce a new premium for those unable to work.

Official costings approved by the Office for Budget Responsibility are expected to be disclosed this week.
Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Trump Reverses Course and Criticises UK-Mauritius Chagos Islands Agreement
Elizabeth Hurley Tells UK Court of ‘Brutal’ Invasion of Privacy in Phone Hacking Case
UK Bond Yields Climb as Report Fuels Speculation Over Andy Burnham’s Return to Parliament
America’s Venezuela Oil Grip Meets China’s Demand: Market Power, Legal Shockwaves, and the New Rules of Energy Leverage
TikTok’s U.S. Escape Plan: National Security Firewall or Political Theater With a Price Tag?
Trump’s Board of Peace: Breakthrough Diplomacy or a Hostile Takeover of Global Order?
Trump’s Board of Peace: Breakthrough Diplomacy or a Hostile Takeover of Global Order?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
Will AI Finally Make Blue-Collar Workers Rich—or Is This Just Elite Tech Spin?
Prince William to Make Official Visit to Saudi Arabia in February
Prince Harry Breaks Down in London Court, Says UK Tabloids Have Made Meghan Markle’s Life ‘Absolute Misery’
Malin + Goetz UK Business Enters Administration, All Stores Close
EU and UK Reject Trump’s Greenland-Linked Tariff Threats and Pledge Unified Response
UK Deepfake Crackdown Puts Intense Pressure on Musk’s Grok AI After Surge in Non-Consensual Explicit Images
Prince Harry Becomes Emotional in London Court, Invokes Memory of Princess Diana in Testimony Against UK Tabloids
UK Inflation Rises Unexpectedly but Interest Rate Cuts Still Seen as Likely
AI vs Work: The Battle Over Who Controls the Future of Labor
Buying an Ally’s Territory: Strategic Genius or Geopolitical Breakdown?
AI Everywhere: Power, Money, War, and the Race to Control the Future
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Arctic Power Grab: Security Chessboard or Climate Crime Scene?
Starmer Steps Back from Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Amid Strained US–UK Relations
Prince Harry’s Lawyer Tells UK Court Daily Mail Was Complicit in Unlawful Privacy Invasions
UK Government Approves China’s ‘Mega Embassy’ in London Amid Debate Over Security and Diplomacy
Trump Cites UK’s Chagos Islands Sovereignty Shift as Justification for Pursuing Greenland Acquisition
UK Government Weighs Australia-Style Social Media Ban for Under-Sixteens Amid Rising Concern Over Online Harm
Trump Aides Say U.S. Has Discussed Offering Asylum to British Jews Amid Growing Antisemitism Concerns
UK Seeks Diplomatic De-escalation with Trump Over Greenland Tariff Threat
Prince Harry Returns to London as High Court Trial Begins Over Alleged Illegal Tabloid Snooping
High-Speed Train Collision in Southern Spain Kills at Least Twenty-One and Injures Scores
Meghan Markle May Return to the U.K. This Summer as Security Review Advances
Trump’s Greenland Tariff Threat Sparks EU Response and Risks Deep Transatlantic Rift
Prince Harry’s High Court Battle With Daily Mail Publisher Begins in London
Trump’s Tariff Escalation Presents Complex Challenges for the UK Economy
UK Prime Minister Starmer Rebukes Trump’s Greenland Tariff Strategy as Transatlantic Tensions Rise
Prince Harry’s Last Press Case in UK Court Signals Potential Turning Point in Media and Royal Relations
OpenAI to Begin Advertising in ChatGPT in Strategic Shift to New Revenue Model
GDP Growth Remains the Most Telling Barometer of Britain’s Economic Health
Prince William and Kate Middleton Stay Away as Prince Harry Visits London Amid Lingering Rift
Britain Braces for Colder Weather and Snow Risk as Temperatures Set to Plunge
Mass Protests Erupt as UK Nears Decision on China’s ‘Mega Embassy’ in London
Prince Harry to Return to UK to Testify in High-Profile Media Trial Against Associated Newspapers
Keir Starmer Rejects Trump’s Greenland Tariff Threat as ‘Completely Wrong’
Trump to hit Europe with 10% tariffs until Greenland deal is agreed
Prince Harry Returns to UK High Court as Final Privacy Trial Against Daily Mail Publisher Begins
×