London Daily

London Daily News
Saturday, Jul 31, 2021

The Wuhan lab-leak theory: Harmful Truth vs Comfortable Ignorance

The Wuhan lab-leak theory: Harmful Truth vs Comfortable Ignorance

The impact of the new investigation into the source of the virus could be more devastating to the global economy than the pandemic itself. The terrible consequences of dragging the world once again into a global war based on a false international intelligence consensus - like the one that led to the war in Iraq - will probably make the public wary of any published intelligence report and suspicious about its real motives regardless its good reasons.
Can the world economy deal with the true-or-false conclusion it is trying to reach on the conspiracy theory regarding the origin of the corona virus?

The theory that the source of the corona virus was a laboratory in the city of Wuhan and the virus leaked from it accidentally or intentionally has made headlines in recent days, with President Joe Biden instructing US intelligence agencies to look into the possibility.

The bigger question, at least as regards the global economy, is: What does it mean if this theory is correct?

if the theory is deemed to be true, it will deliver the hardest blow to the global economy in centuries. Because governments will have no choice but to respond with sanctions and demands for full compensation.

Chinese products may be suddenly removed from the global market, creating a vicious cycle and an inflationary eruption. World trade will collapse. Chinese markets will crash when Chinese money is withdrawn from them. Confidence in China will collapse. All of this will do more damage than the corona virus itself - so this issue is the biggest danger right now for world economic stability.

Conspiracy theories are always circulating in the air. The damage they do is usually limited to some slight disorder caused by their obsessive-compulsive proponents and do not cause real harm.

But now the Wuhan lab-leak theory is starting to move to the center of the discourse.

President Biden, as much as he wants to avoid his predecessor's more absurd ideas, is at least willing to consider the possibility. Intelligence agencies are collecting evidence. The World Health Organization is showing interest.

Furthermore, there's another possible twist to this tale, which would be supremely ironic if it were not so deadly serious. Without going into the details I have - as I am not sure about their credibility - I can only hint that, if the investigation leads to the conclusion that the virus leaked from a lab in Wuhan, China will at any time be able to admit to the theft of the virus from a research lab on the other side of the globe.

Of course, there may be no basis for the Wuhan lab-leak theory anyway. But we love to blame China whenever it doesn’t sound good to blame Russia ... for whatever goes wrong.

But if it turns out to be the truth, or even if the claim is not fully proven, it will not just be a huge political event. It will be a catastrophic economic blow, which the markets have not even begun to think about.

Think for a moment about the possibility that the virus did not originate in a bat in the Wuhan food market, but actually in the research laboratory in that city. There is no doubt that the world will have to respond in some way.

What’s even worse, it will mean that China whitewashed the truth for a year and a half, while 3.5 million people were dying and all countries were enforcing devastating closures of one kind or another. This is not something that can be swept under the rug. The minimum response will be sanctions and a claim for compensation. Anything less than that will be considered unacceptable weakness.

China accounts for 15% of world trade, with sales of $ 3 trillion annually. It is the main supplier of everyday consumer products, as well as advanced electronic products. Any kind of sanctions that restricted the flow of goods would suffocate manufacturers, create bottlenecks, shut down factories and leave empty shelves in stores worldwide. It would take years to build a similar production capacity outside of China, and in the meantime there would be a massive surge in inflation when the supply of almost everything dried up.

Then, inevitably, a huge financial crisis will happen. China owns $ 1.1 trillion in US government bonds, the largest foreign holding. If these are sold or frozen, the Federal Reserve will have no choice but to purchase them itself and thus greatly increase the supply of money. Chinese money will disappear from the banks and they will need emergency assistance. The equity market will go into chaos, as China holds $ 1.5 trillion of it in the U.S. alone.

It could be argued that the global repercussions would be too dangerous for the world to proceed with punitive sanctions. But even if most of the world decided against full-scale sanctions, there would still be dire consequences. There would be obvious reluctance to continue to trade with a country that has shown such contempt for the consequences of its actions on the world.

And if it was a leak from the lab, then the incompetence of the staff and the amorality of China's cover-up are on an epic scale. It would make the Chernobyl disaster and the Chernobyl Soviet cover-up look like a minor incident. As for now, the leak from the lab is currently just a theory. In the coming months we will find out if there really is any truth to it.

But if it is true, it will cause an economic earthquake of unprecedented proportions - several times worse than the one from the pandemic, which is already the worst in modern history.

The above can be summarized briefly, in a statement that the search for the full facts that led to the creation of the virus is extremely important medically, and may turn out to be extremely destructive from an economic point of view. And on the question of whether it is better to be poor with better chances of being healthy or rich with greater chances of being sick everyone will have to answer for themselves.
Comments

Eric 57 days ago
Addi,

I do not disagree with you about the facts but only about what we should do in response to them.

While you see the article as protecting China, I wrote it from exactly the opposite point of view: protecting the rest of the world regardless how good it will do also for China.

As of myself I have no doubts where the virus came from, to the market in Wuhan and from there to the world, and how it came TO China, TO Wuhan and from where. The history of this virus is more complex than the public is able to imagine nor digest, so I'll keep the details to myself.

My article is not about acquitting China from it’s part of responsibility but to say that not all what is legally right to do is also practically smart to do.

My motto: Our desire for revenge on others must not cause us more harm than others have already done to us anyway. (“An eye for an eye only ends up making the whole world blind”. Mahatma Gandhi).

Self-destruction in the name of the desire to take revenge on others is not the only choice. We need to be smart and not just right. Our need to return normalization to the world economy must overcome our desire to run amok and vent our anger.

We have children to feed and families to maintain, and that is far more important than starving others and destroying their families.

The article seeks to balance. The article suggests taking into account the damage that will be done to us by a boycott of those who provide us with almost everything we consume, and not just calculate the damage that will be done to them by a boycott against the supply of everything we consume.

Committing suicide to kill the enemy is a method of stupid terrorists, not of smart armies.

I'm sorry to sound like Trump, but as I recall it was exactly his agenda on his first day as president: to bring production back to the West and reduce to zero the absolute dependence of world consumption on one country. But the hate for Trump was greater than the love for USA and here we are.

This is the step that I think must be done, with or without the virus. And believe me, for this strategy, the one who has to pay me is the West and not the CCP ...

Unfortunately no one likes to pay for someone who thinks outside the box. Neither they nor we. Everyone pays a lot to hear only what reinforces the opinion that we are captives anyway.

Our instinct is to punish others by destroying them instead of compensating ourselves by building our own success that will be much greater than theirs.

This is our main problem. That hatred for others outweighs the love we have for ourselves. Only arms dealers and coffin sellers get rich from this.
Addi 57 days ago
The lab leak has been obvious for nearly a year and a half. And yes, China should be responsible on all fronts. This article doesn't even mention the fact that China stopped all air traffic between Wuhan and the rest of China, but allowed, for nearly a month, hundreds of international flights from Wuhan, intentionally seeding the world with the virus.

How much does the author receive from the CCP?

Newsletter

Related Articles

London Daily
×