Six more women have accused Russell Brand of sexual misconduct, including two who allege that he continued having sex with them after they asked him to stop because he was hurting them.

The allegations, published in a newspaper investigation, concern encounters between 2005 and 2015. Brand has previously denied wrongdoing and maintained that all his relationships were consensual. His lawyer said he would consider “injunctive relief” but did not respond to the new allegations by an agreed deadline.

One woman said she had an on-off relationship with Brand in the late 2000s after a professional meeting at his London home. She alleged that he continued having sex with her despite her saying “No, stop”. She said he subsequently apologised in person and by text message.

Another woman, who encountered Brand while queuing with a friend to meet him in 2007, aged 19, alleged that he ignored her requests to stop during painful sex. She claimed he said afterwards: “Tonight was consensual. Nobody did anything they didn’t want to do.”

A fan, then in her late 20s, alleged that Brand “manhandled” her and forced his hand down her trousers after performing at The Chapel in San Francisco in 2013. She said: “I didn’t resist. I just sort of let it happen.”

A fourth woman, then in her mid-20s, said Brand approached her at a music festival in 2005 and offered to pay her for sex.

Another woman, who was in her late 20s when she won a BBC 6 Music competition and became a guest on his show in 2006, said they saw each other sporadically over the following year. She alleged that he told her to lick a toilet seat at his house and became angry when she refused, which she interpreted as anger at her unwillingness to be humiliated.

The sixth woman worked at a London venue Brand regularly visited in 2015. She said a member of his staff told her “Russell wants you” and directed her to the disabled toilets. She alleged that Brand was inside with the lights off, asked for toilet paper and grabbed her when she went to hand it to him.

The new allegations could not be published until Brand’s trial ended, to avoid prejudicing proceedings.

Culture Secretary Lisa Nandy told MPs that ministers “would not hesitate” to act if protections already put in place were inadequate. That leaves any further government action conditional on whether those protections are sufficient.