London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Tuesday, Aug 05, 2025

Former Israeli Defense Minister explains the reason, in his view, that justifies killing innocent civilians in Gaza

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not between good people and bad people, but between two groups of people whose bad luck has pushed them into a situation where both sides seem to have no choice but to choose between killing or being killed. Despair, rage, revenge and a one-sided sense of justice prevent both sides from choosing the natural option of living and letting live.

“Bella Hadid, Trevor Noah & John Oliver: What would you do if endless missile attacks on your civilians were conducted from a hospital, school and office building where there are also media offices?” Israel’s former Defense Minister Naftali Bennett responds to growing criticism around the world against the use of Israel's military force against targets that result in the mass killing of innocent civilians 

No one can challenge the facts that Mr. Naftali Bennett highlights from one side and Bella Hadid, Trevor Noah & John Oliver highlight from the other. 


And this is where the problem known as the Israeli-Palestinian conflict begins and ends: everyone is factually correct, in a one-sided description, of this two-sided problem.

The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is not between good people and bad people, but between two groups of people whose bad luck has pushed them into a situation where both sides seem to have no choice but to choose between killing or being killed.

Despair, rage, revenge and a one-sided sense of justice prevent both sides from choosing the natural option of living and letting live.

The interests of too many powerful foreign states wanting to control the region through a divide-and-conquer strategy are not helping either of the local peoples to choose peace as a viable option.

The majority of the general public on both sides are only interested in living their own lives in peace, rather than continuing to raise children just to be killed or to kill others.

But the public - on both sides - are trapped in a cynical political game, where the rules of the game are quite clear: peace is a boring election issue that cannot get an indifferent public out of the house to vote. Whereas hatred, war and paranoia trigger the exciting adrenaline rush that galvanizes the extreme voters, driving them to the voting booths, and delivering election victory.

C'est la vie. This is democracy. And here we are.

According to Mr. Bennett, Israel has only two options: to avoid massive military action and die, or to act militarily with all its superpower, even at the cost of inevitable murder of many innocent civilians, and destroying essential civilian infrastructure such as hospitals, schools and international media outlets.

For some unfathomable reason, the former defense minister of a country that claims to have the best intelligence in the world does not mention that there is a third possibility, that has been tested and successfully executed hundreds, if not thousands of times in the past, which is to act against military targets and terrorists only, not by attacking with massive bombardment from the air, but by precision-point commando operations, as well as by local gangs and cooperators.

However, there is no dispute that it is not just the right but the duty of the Israeli government to do everything it can to protect its innocent civilians from Hamas' murderous missile attacks. But it is highly disputable that the indiscriminate killing and collective punishment of masses of innocent civilians is what the State of Israel should choose as the final solution to what it and it’s supporters see as terrorism, and what Palestine and its supporters see as a war for independence.

There are not “only” humanitarian but also historical reasons that require the State of Israel to refrain from collective punishment that causes the deaths of many innocent civilians, including children, women, and the elderly.

There is also strategic reason why Israel should stop any attack on civilians - regardless of how high profile is a terrorist that is hiding among them and using them as a human shield.

Expanding the circle of innocent victims does not combat terrorism, but simply increases the number of those who have no other way but terrorism to avenge the murder of their family members.

In other words, the State of Israel must not increase the motivation of a weakened population to join the cycle of revenge by means of terrorism, but rather nullify their motives and prevent their justification for choosing terrorism as their only means to achieve justice.

The millions of Palestinians living in the so-called autonomous zone are already seriously afflicted and destabilized by their limited civil rights. An effective war on terrorism needs to provide them with hope instead of despair, and with fairness instead of giving them justifiable reasons for taking revenge.

The confrontation between the Jews and the Palestinians is not a confrontation between good and evil. It is a conflict between two peoples, who are descendants of the same father, who believe in the same God, and who are fated to live together in a small country with many places that are holy for all of them. Shouldn’t there be a better alternative than terror to get justice (and contrary to the common fantasy, a peace brought about by force is not a substitute for justice, obviously).



Do both sides really believe in God?

Those with a true and sincere faith in God - actually the same God for all - must not try to deny the fact that the two descendants of Abraham are brothers, and that neither of the two religions (or in fact none of the three) have any sort of ownership on God.

Attempting to take ownership of God instead of allowing each person to honor and work for God in his own way, is an act of heresy contrary to the most fundamental principles of all religions.

All should accept the simple fact that God is the owner of all peoples alike, regardless of their prophets.

Furthermore, it is an abuse of the name of God to attempt to take ownership of materialistic assets that are holy to all of God's peoples.

It is contrary to religion to fight for control of God's places instead of worshipping the very same God together, in any holy place, each in his own way, each through his own prophets, way and flavor. It is contrary to religion to oppose God's work by being exclusive to one people instead of encouraging all people to honor the same God.

Assuming that genocide is not a legitimate option for either side of this conflict, the only alternative is a fair compromise based on mutual respect and a complete and equal freedom for each side. This outcome would recognize and reconcile with reality as it is, instead of denying it and embarking on a joint suicide mission for the sake of trying to turn history back 70 years, or even 3000 years.

Both sides must maximize the enormous potential of living in peace instead of remaining enslaved to the tragedies of a history that in any case cannot be reversed. No act of revenge is capable of making the future of any nation better or less tragic.

There is no God but the one and the only God who commands all people - Jews, Muslims and Christians - to live and let others live. He who claims otherwise is not the representative of God.

It is time for the 99% in both sides of the conflict to ignore the 1% who are profiting from the bloodshed, put the past behind them and to move forward.

Not because the land does not belong to the other side, but because both sides have no other land to live in.



 


Comments

Alfred 4 year ago
Imagine the controversy if a leading/former politician were to
try and justify the killing of Jewish civilians.
Hitchcock 4 year ago
Alfred:
“Those responsible for the occupying Palestine” (That was United nation in 1948, remember?) “and their supporters” (33 states voted for, only 13 against it) “will have to bear the burden of History recording their being responsible for the Palestinian Holocaust” (here is your big mistake. The only reason that there is currently a conflict, is that the Jews did not “commit Holocaust” to the Palestinians, as USA, Canada, Australia and New Zeland did to their natives. This is a tragic situation of two nations that has left with no other choice but to do bad things to each other. it is wrong, and many things could and should be done totally different, but Holocaust Is not and even not 1% of it is not. Israel is handling this crisis wrong, and Hamas helping them to handle it even worse. The solution is not to blame, but to contain. On both sides.
Alfred 4 year ago
"Descendants of the same father" seems therefore they are both Semites, Wait that wont work as it would destroy the anti-Semite propaganda.
Alfred 4 year ago
Hitchcock ;
Those responsible for the occupying Palestine and their supporters will have to bear the burden of History recording their being responsible for the Palestinian Holocaust.
Hitchcock 4 year ago
No Alfred. You are wrong. We can argue if what Mr. Benet said is right or wrong, but it is absolutely wrong to use disagreement with whatever he said to justify or even just tolerate anti-semitism.

Mr. Benet is not speaking in the name of the Jews or Judaism. He is a representative of the Israel Government. Or in fact -as of today- he is part of the minority of the Israeli... opposition.

Many Jewish people, inside Israel and around the world, opposed loud and clear the operation in Gaza. So the dispute is not with or against “Jews”, therefore nothing in it to justify antisemitism.

Some Jewish, as well as Christians and Muslims by the way, think that Israel has the right to defend themselves aggressively, and some not.

It has nothing to do with semitism or antisemitism. Many Christians supports the Israeli operations in Gaza. And that doesn’t justify anti Christianity too.

So it’s not a “Jewish” issue. It’s an “Israeli” issue. Do not mix the two, nor generalize blame.

Israel is not “The” Jewish state (America has more Jewish than Israel, and millions are in Europe, Canada and Australia).

It’s a democratic-Jewish state where, believe it or not, an Islamic party got more votes in the last election than Mr. Benet. So like it or not, the voters who will decide who will be the Israel’s next prime minister it’s the Israeli-Muslim voters, not Mr. Benet who is supported by only 300,000 voters (3.5% of all Israeli citizens and 1.5% of all the Jews in the world).

Not everything that a Jew is doing right or wrong it’s a Jewish problem or Nobel. Just as not everything that a Christian or a Muslim does represent all of them or the majority of them.

Personally I think that Mr. Benet is wrong. It’s wrong to bomb terrorist among civilians. But this is my opinion in my comfort luxury and safe zone. If they would even think to shoot at my home or harm my children’s, my opinion will be that Mr. Benet is too soft and the Israeli reaction is too gentle. c'est la vie, as I wrote in the article...
Alfred 4 year ago
What a horrible thing to say, no wonder the rise in ant-Semitism is reaching unprecedented heights.

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Elon Musk Receives $23.7 Billion Tesla Stock Award
Texas House Paralyzed After Democrats Walk Out Over Redistricting
Mexican Cartels Complicate Sheinbaum’s U.S. Security Talks
Mark Zuckerberg Declares War on the iPhone
India Rejects U.S. Tariff Threat, Defends Russian Oil Purchases
United States Establishes Strategic Bitcoin Reserve and Digital Asset Stockpile
Thousands of Private ChatGPT Conversations Accidentally Indexed by Google
China Tightens Mineral Controls, Curtailing Critical Inputs for Western Defence Contractors
OpenAI’s Bold Bet: Teaching AI to Think, Not Just Chat
Tesla Seeks Shareholder Approval for $29 Billion Compensation Package for Elon Musk
Nvidia is cutting prices on its RTX 50-series graphics cards after sales slowed and inventories piled up
Ghislaine Maxwell Transferred to Minimum-Security Prison Amid Ongoing DOJ Discussions
U.S. Tariffs Surge to Highest Levels in Nearly a Century Under Second Trump Term
Matt Taibbi Slams Media for Role in Russiagate Narrative
Pilots Call for Mental Health Support Without Stigma
All Five Trapped Miners Found Dead After El Teniente Mine Collapse
Ong Beng Seng Pleads Guilty in Corruption Case Linked to Former Singapore Transport Minister
BP’s Largest Oil and Gas Find in 25 Years Uncovered Offshore Brazil
Italy Fines Shein One Million Euros for Misleading Sustainability Claims
JPMorgan and Coinbase Unveil Partnership to Let Chase Cardholders Buy Crypto Directly
Declassified Annex Links Soros‑Affiliated Officials and Clinton Campaign to ‘Russiagate’ Narrative
UK's Online Safety Law: A Front for Censorship
Nationwide Protests Erupt in Brazil Demanding Presidential Resignation
Parents Abandon Child at Barcelona Airport Over Passport Issue
Mystery Surrounds Death of Brazilian Woman with iPhones Glued to Her Body
Bus Driver Discovers Toddler Hidden in Suitcase in New Zealand
Switzerland Celebrates 734 Years of Independence Amid Global Changes
U.S. Opens Official Investigation into Former Trump Prosecutor Jack Smith
Leaked audio of Canada's new PM Mark Carney admitting the truth about the Net Zero agenda: "We're gonna make a lot of money off of this."
China Enforces Comprehensive Ban on Cryptocurrency Activities
Absolutely 100% Realistic EVO Series Doll by EXDOLL (Chinese Company) used mainly for carnal purposes
World Economic Forum founder Klaus Schwab: "In this new world, we must accept... total transparency. You have to get used to it. You have to behave accordingly. But if you have nothing to hide, you shouldn't be afraid."
Meet Mufti Hamid Patel, head of Office for Standards in Education in Pakistan
George Soros tells the World Economic Forum: "President Trump is a con man and the ultimate narcissist, who wants the world to revolve around him."
Hamas are STARVING the hostages.
Decline in Tourism in Majorca Amidst Ongoing Anti-Tourism Protests
British Tourist Dies Following Hair Transplant in Turkey, Police Investigate
Poland Begins Excavation at Dziemiany After New Clue to World War II‑Era Nazi Treasure
WhatsApp Users Targeted in New Scam Involving Account Takeovers
Trump Threatens Canada with Tariffs Over Palestinian State Recognition
Trump Deploys Nuclear Submarines After Threats from Former Russian President Medvedev
Trump Sues Murdoch in “Heavyweight Bout”: Lawsuit Over Alleged Epstein Letter Sets Stage for Courtroom Showdown
Germany Enters Fiscal Crisis as Cabinet Approves €174 Billion in New Debt
Trump Administration Finalizes Broad Tariff Increases on Global Trade Partners
J.K. Rowling Limits Public Engagements Citing Safety Fears
JD.com Launches €2.2 Billion Bid for German Electronics Retailer Ceconomy
Azerbaijan Proceeds with Plan to Legalise Casinos on Artificial Islands
Former Judge Charged After Drunk Driving Crash Kills Comedian in Brazil
Jeff Bezos hasn’t paid a dollar in taxes for decades. He makes billions and pays $0 in taxes, LEGALLY
China Increases Use of Exit Bans Amid Rising U.S. Tensions
×