Jake Fahri, convicted for the murder of Jimmy Mizen, emerges as rapper TEN with songs featured on BBC 1Xtra
The case of Jake Fahri, who was convicted of murdering 16-year-old Jimmy Mizen in 2008, has resurfaced following reports of his emergence as a rapper whose music has been promoted by BBC 1Xtra.
Fahri, now 35, was sentenced to life in prison with a minimum term of 14 years in 2009 after the incident in a south London bakery that resulted in Mizen's death.
Recently, reports surfaced that Fahri, under the alias TEN, has released music that has been played on platforms such as Spotify and YouTube.
The BBC's 1Xtra reportedly featured TEN's tracks, with DJ Theo
Johnson highlighting him as an 'up-and-coming star.' The lyrics of one of TEN's songs allegedly reference the notorious crime, prompting scrutiny.
The HM Prison and Probation Service (HMPPS) has announced an investigation into TEN's content, emphasizing that they treat any material potentially glorifying violence with utmost priority.
A representative for Keir Starmer stated that the HMPPS's decision to scrutinize the content was appropriate, while adding that the BBC, as an independent entity, has editorial autonomy.
Public expectations, however, demand that the broadcaster handle such complaints seriously given its responsibilities.
Fahri was released on licence in June 2023, after reportedly serving his sentence primarily at a category C prison.
The Mizen family expressed concerns over the parole process, questioning the efficacy of programs completed by Fahri during his incarceration.
Jimmy's father, Barry Mizen, voiced apprehensions about the decision to release Fahri, suggesting that it raises questions about the prison system's role in rehabilitation.
In response to the reports, the BBC clarified that TEN's music does not feature on any of the network's playlists and that they have no further plans to broadcast his music.
The broadcaster emphasized their unawareness of Fahri's background and reiterated their stance against condoning violent actions.
As investigations by the HMPPS continue, the case has sparked a broader debate about the responsibilities of broadcasters in promoting content from individuals with criminal histories and the challenges of balancing artistic freedom with public sensitivity.