A British woman who reported being raped while in Hong Kong is now facing the possibility of criminal prosecution after local authorities alleged that elements of her complaint were inconsistent with evidence gathered during the investigation.

The woman initially filed a report with Hong Kong police alleging sexual assault.

Following an inquiry that included forensic analysis and interviews, investigators concluded that aspects of the account could not be substantiated.

Police subsequently indicated that they were considering charges related to allegedly providing false information to law enforcement.

Under Hong Kong law, knowingly making a false report to police can carry significant penalties, including potential imprisonment.

The case has prompted debate among legal observers and advocacy groups about the treatment of complainants in sexual assault investigations and the balance between preventing false reporting and safeguarding victims’ willingness to come forward.

Supporters of the woman argue that inconsistencies in trauma reporting are not uncommon and have urged authorities to ensure that any prosecutorial decision is grounded in a careful review of all available evidence.

Legal representatives have said the woman maintains that she acted in good faith when making the report.

Hong Kong police have stated that investigations into allegations of sexual assault are handled with seriousness and sensitivity, but that maintaining the integrity of the justice system requires action where false reporting is suspected.

The Department of Justice will ultimately determine whether formal charges are brought.

The case remains under review, with no final decision announced on prosecution.

If charges proceed, the matter would be adjudicated in Hong Kong’s courts, where both the evidentiary findings and the circumstances of the original complaint would be subject to legal scrutiny.