London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Saturday, May 31, 2025

Woman handed £15,000 after being sacked because she was pregnant

Woman handed £15,000 after being sacked because she was pregnant

An admin worker has been awarded nearly £15,000 in compensation after she was sacked immediately after telling her boss she was pregnant.

Charlotte Leitch, 34, had only been working at the Essex-based security system supplier when she met with the company’s head of compliance Nicola Calder to discuss concerns about her pregnancy.

She revealed she had suffered several miscarriages in the past and was worried about her unborn child’s wellbeing.

But instead of reassurance, Ms Leitch said she was made to feel ‘degraded and worthless’ when Ms Calder – a mother herself – claimed she was not entitled to any maternity leave as she had yet to sign her new employee contract and told her: ‘We have no obligation to keep you on.’

Within weeks of being sacked, she sadly lost her baby.

She also split with her partner of six years, saying the ‘nightmare’ of an eighth miscarriage had ‘destroyed’ them and remains out of work while she recovers.

Speaking after the employment tribunal, in which she won £14,885 after successfully suing for pregnancy discrimination and unfair dismissal, she said: ‘It traumatised me.

‘It had a severe impact on my life. It caused absolute chaos. I couldn’t hold down another job, I got panic attacks all the time.’

The tribunal heard she joined CIS Services in May 2021 as an administrative assistant, earning £20,000 a year.


Ms Leitch sadly lost her baby weeks after she was sacked

She had not yet put pen to paper on her new employee contract by the time she was let go after raising concerns about it.

At the meeting with Ms Calder she explained her fears for the health of her unborn child, revealed how distraught she and her partner were at having recently lost twins, and described feeling uncertain about whether this pregnancy would be successful.

In response, the tribunal heard Ms Calder claimed she was not entitled to maternity leave as she had not signed the contract and said the firm was under no obligation to keep her on.

Ms Leitch was given the option of leaving there and then, working until the end of the day, or until the following day, the tribunal heard.

In an email following the meeting, she told Mrs Calder and company director Chris Clark: ‘This has made me feel uncomfortable, created an immediate financial stress additional to being made to feel that I and my baby are insignificant to the company.

‘I am extremely disheartened that I have been treated this way and the trust and support which was expected from HR, or the director was not offered.’

Ms Leitch successfully sued for pregnancy discrimination and unfair dismissal


Mrs Calder alleged that Ms Leitch had indicated that she wanted to leave her job during the initial meeting, and said she was simply offering the employee options for a final date of work.

The company then said that it had already decided to terminate her employment if she did not sign her contact as it was concerned about her work performance.

A letter sent to the ex-employee said: ‘The decision to terminate your employment was made irrespective of you being pregnant and we categorically deny that we have discriminated against you.’

The tribunal rejected this and concluded that both of Ms Leitch’s claims of pregnancy discrimination and unfair dismissal were well-founded.

Employment Judge Carol Porter said: ‘Words were spoken under emotional stress and Mrs Calder took advantage of the situation and took steps to terminate [Miss Leitch’s] employment, giving [her] options as to the date when she would leave, and seeking, in the first instance, to make out that this was a mutual agreement.

‘However, as soon as [Ms Leitch] challenged that, Mrs Calder did not persist with that false assertion, but sent the letter confirming that the [assistant] had indeed been dismissed.

‘Having considered all the circumstances, we find that the principal reason for dismissal, the reason uppermost in Mrs Calder’s mind was (Ms Leitch’s) pregnancy and (her) history of pregnancy related illness.

‘(She) was dismissed for a reason connected with her pregnancy.’

Ms Leitch, who lives in Rochford, Essex, said afterwards she hopes the outcome of her case will encourage other women facing pregnancy discrimination to take action.

She said: ‘We can stand up for ourselves, and I’m happy that other women can use my case in the future, so it doesn’t happen to them.

‘Employers don’t need to destroy people’s lives – every life matters. To put a pregnant woman through that is horrendous. You should not be bullied out of work.

‘We can stand up for ourselves, and there is support. Go to ACAS – they can tell you what the rules are.’

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Satirical Sketch Sparks Political Spouse Feud in South Korea
Indonesia Quarry Collapse Leaves Multiple Dead and Missing
South Korean Election Video Pulled Amid Misogyny Outcry
Asian Economies Shift Away from US Dollar Amid Trade Tensions
Netflix Investigates Allegations of On-Set Mistreatment in K-Drama Production
US Defence Chief Reaffirms Strong Ties with Singapore Amid Regional Tensions
Vietnam Faces Strategic Dilemma Over China's Mekong River Projects
Malaysia's First AI Preacher Sparks Debate on Islamic Principles
White House Press Secretary Criticizes Harvard Funding, Advocates for Vocational Training
France to Implement Nationwide Smoking Ban in Outdoor Spaces Frequented by Children
Meta and Anduril Collaborate on AI-Driven Military Augmented Reality Systems
Russia's Fossil Fuel Revenues Approach €900 Billion Since Ukraine Invasion
U.S. Justice Department Reduces American Bar Association's Role in Judicial Nominations
U.S. Department of Energy Unveils 'Doudna' Supercomputer to Advance AI Research
U.S. SEC Dismisses Lawsuit Against Binance Amid Regulatory Shift
Alcohol Industry Faces Increased Scrutiny Amid Health Concerns
Italy Faces Population Decline Amid Youth Emigration
U.S. Goods Imports Plunge Nearly 20% Amid Tariff Disruptions
OpenAI Faces Competition from Cheaper AI Rivals
Foreign Tax Provision in U.S. Budget Bill Alarms Investors
Trump Accuses China of Violating Trade Agreement
Gerry Adams Wins Libel Case Against BBC
Russia Accuses Serbia of Supplying Arms to Ukraine
EU Central Bank Pushes to Replace US Dollar with Euro as World’s Main Currency
Chinese Woman Dies After Being Forced to Visit Bank Despite Critical Illness
President Trump Grants Full Pardons to Reality TV Stars Todd and Julie Chrisley
Texas Enacts App Store Accountability Act Mandating Age Verification
U.S. Health Secretary Ends Select COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations
Vatican Calls for Sustainable Tourism in 2025 Message
Trump Warns Putin Is 'Playing with Fire' Amid Escalating Ukraine Conflict
India and Pakistan Engage Trump-Linked Lobbyists to Influence U.S. Policy
U.S. Halts New Student Visa Interviews Amid Enhanced Security Measures
Trump Administration Cancels $100 Million in Federal Contracts with Harvard
SpaceX Starship Test Flight Ends in Failure, Mars Mission Timeline Uncertain
King Charles Affirms Canadian Sovereignty Amid U.S. Statehood Pressure
Trump Threatens 25% Tariff on iPhones Amid Dispute with Apple CEO
Putin's Helicopter Reportedly Targeted by Ukrainian Drones
Liverpool Car Ramming Incident Leaves Multiple Injured
Australia Faces Immigration Debate Following Labor Party Victory
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Founder Warns Against Trusting Regime in Nuclear Talks
Macron Dismisses Viral Video of Wife's Gesture as Playful Banter
Cleveland Clinic Study Questions Effectiveness of Recent Flu Vaccine
Netanyahu Accuses Starmer of Siding with Hamas
Junior Doctors Threaten Strike Over 4% Pay Offer
Labour MPs Urge Chancellor to Tax Wealthy Over Cutting Welfare
Publication of UK Child Poverty Strategy Delayed Until Autumn
France Detains UK Fishing Vessel Amid Post-Brexit Tensions
Calls Grow to Resume Syrian Asylum Claims in UK
Nigel Farage Pledges to Reinstate Winter Fuel Payments
Boris and Carrie Johnson Welcome Daughter Poppy
×