London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Thursday, Jul 10, 2025

Sleep-in care workers entitled to minimum wage only when awake, court rules

Sleep-in care workers entitled to minimum wage only when awake, court rules

Decision means workers can only receive payment when they are ‘actively helping client’
The government is under pressure to reform care laws after the supreme court ruled that support workers on “sleep-in” shifts are not required to be paid the national minimum wage for hours when they are not awake..

The decision ends a four-year legal battle involving two care workers and the learning disability charity Mencap that threatened to leave care providers with a potential £400m back-pay bill potentially jeopardising the care of vulnerable people.

The court said care workers should only be paid the national minimum wage hourly rate on sleep-in shifts when they were awake for the purposes of working.

While it ends the immediate possibility that huge back-pay bills would force care providers to close, the decision means thousands of care support workers – already on low incomes – potentially face substantial cuts in earnings.

Since the original court ruling in 2017, many sleep-in care workers have been paid at an hourly rate rather than a flat rate, in effect doubling the cost of a shift to about £70. The supreme court ruling has led to speculation that some providers will revert to the £35 flat rate.

One sleep-in care support worker working with highly vulnerable disabled clients said he would lose about £160 a month if his employers reverted to the old rates. “We are really panicking. People have mortgages to pay and children to feed. The impact would be massive.”

The ruling was welcomed by Mencap, which said it would continue to pay its staff at the enhanced hourly rate. It urged the government to change the law on sleep-in payments, and councils to continue to cover the cost of enhanced rates in contracts.

Edel Harris, Mencap’s chief executive, said: “Mencap contested this case because of the devastating unfunded back-pay liabilities facing providers across the sector. This was estimated at £400m. Sleep-ins are a statutory care service which should be funded by local authorities, and ultimately government.

“It is no exaggeration to say that if the ruling had been different, it would have severely impacted on a sector which is already underfunded and stretched to breaking point. Some providers would have gone bust, and ultimately the people who rely on care would have suffered.”

A spokesperson for the prime minister said: “We are aware of the judgment from the supreme court. Care workers perform a vital role and they have worked tirelessly throughout the pandemic to support our most vulnerable and we are absolutely committed to supporting them.”

Unison called the ruling “a huge blow” for thousands of care workers. The union’s general secretary, Christina McAnea, said: “No one is a winner from today’s judgment. Everyone loses until the government intervenes to mend a broken system that relies on paying skilled staff a pittance.”

Clare Tomlinson-Blake, one of the care workers who brought the case, said: “This case was never about the money. ​It was about the principle of treating staff fairly. Sleep-in shifts aren’t about just being on call – it’s work. Staff are constantly on guard to protect the most vulnerable in society.”

Dr Rhidian Hughes, the chief executive of the Voluntary Organisations Disability Group, said while the judgment provided some welcome clarity, there was still significant uncertainty. “We are concerned of potential kneejerk reactions of local authority commissioners up and down the country which could see funding reduced, and therefore the pay of staff affected.”

Before 2017, care workers on sleep-ins were paid a flat rate, receiving an hourly rate only for the hours they were awake for the purposes of working. This changed after guidance said care workers should be paid the national minimum wage for all the hours they were at work, regardless of whether they were asleep.

An employment tribunal confirmed this in 2017, in effect doubling the cost of a sleep-in shift to £70. It also said providers should be liable for six years of back-pay to carers, leading to fears that care providers would be bankrupted.

A year later the appeal court reversed the back-pay decision and ruled flat-rate payments were fair, meaning sleep-in care workers could receive the full rate only for those hours during which they were awake and assisting the client.
Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Severe Heatwave Claims 2,300 Lives Across Europe
NVIDIA Achieves Historic Milestone as First Company Valued at $4 Trillion
Declining Beer Consumption Signals Cultural Shift in Germany
Linda Yaccarino Steps Down as CEO of X After Two Years
US Imposes New Tariffs on Brazilian Exports Amid Political Tensions
Azerbaijan and Armenia are on the brink of a historic peace deal.
Emails Leaked: How Passenger Luggage Became a Side Income for Airport Workers
Polish MEP: “Dear Leftists - China is laughing at you, Russia is laughing, India is laughing”
BRICS Expands Membership with Indonesia and Ten New Partner Countries
Weinstein Victim’s Lawyer Says MeToo Movement Still Strong
U.S. Enacts Sweeping Tax and Spending Legislation Amid Trade Policy Shifts
Football Mourns as Diogo Jota and Brother André Silva Laid to Rest in Portugal
Labour Expected to Withdraw Support for Special Needs Funding Model
Leaked Audio Reveals Tory Aide Defending DEI Record
Elon Musk Founds a Party Following a Poll on X: "You Wanted It – You Got It!"
London Stock Exchange Faces Historic Low in Initial Public Offerings
A new online platform has emerged in the United Kingdom, specifically targeting Muslim men seeking virgin brides
Trump Celebrates Independence Day with B-2 Flyover and Signs Controversial Legislation
Boris Johnson Urges Conservatives to Ignore Farage
SNP Ordered to Update Single-Sex Space Guidance Within Days
Starmer Set to Reject Calls for Wealth Taxes
Stolen Century-Old Rolls-Royce Recovered After Hotel Theft
Macron Presses Starmer to Recognise Palestinian State
Labour Delayed Palestine Action Ban Over Riot Concerns
Swinney’s Tax Comments ‘Offensive to Scots’, Say Tories
High Street Retailers to Enforce Bans on Serial Shoplifters
Music Banned by Henry VIII to Be Performed After 500 Years
Steve Coogan Says Working Class Is Being ‘Ethnically Cleansed’
Home Office Admits Uncertainty Over Visa Overstayer Numbers
JD Vance Questions Mandelson Over Reform Party’s Rising Popularity
Macron to Receive Windsor Carriage Ride in Royal Gesture
Labour Accused of ‘Hammering’ Scots During First Year in Power
BBC Head of Music Stood Down Amid Bob Vylan Controversy
Corbyn Eyes Hard-Left Challenge to Starmer’s Leadership
London Tube Trains Suspended After Major Fire Erupts Nearby
Richard Kemp: I Felt Safer in Israel Under Attack Than in the UK
Cyclist Says Police Cited Human Rights Act for Riding No-Handed
China’s Central Bank Consults European Peers on Low-Rate Strategies
AI Raises Alarms Over Long-Term Job Security
Saudi Arabia Maintains Ties with Iran Despite Israel Conflict
Musk Battles to Protect Tesla Amid Trump Policy Threats
Air France-KLM Acquires Majority Stake in Scandinavian Airlines
UK Educators Sound Alarm on Declining Child Literacy
Shein Fined €40 Million in France Over Misleading Discounts
Brazil’s Lula Visits Kirchner During Argentina House Arrest
Trump Scores Legislative Win as House Passes Tax Reform Bill
Keir Starmer Faces Criticism After Rocky First Year in Power
DJI Launches Heavy-Duty Coaxial Quadcopter with 80 kg Lift Capacity
U.S. Senate Approves Major Legislation Dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in U.S. History Announced by DOJ
×