London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Friday, Jan 23, 2026

It’s time for Ireland to stand up to the EU

It’s time for Ireland to stand up to the EU

Ireland’s political class is facing a moment of truth. Following yesterday’s extraordinary events - with the EU temporarily triggering Article 16 of the Northern Ireland Protocol as part of its desperate effort to manage its self-made vaccines crisis - the Dublin elites have some serious soul-searching to do.
They must now ask themselves if they are willing to be members of this institution that has just treated them with such contempt; which has just signalled in front of the entire world that it does not take Irish sovereignty or Irish democracy very seriously at all.

Contempt is not too strong a word for what the EU has just done to Ireland. Let’s leave to one side what the EU’s overriding of the Brexit deal and temporary triggering of Article 16 tells us about its view of the UK. We already knew that the commissioners and bureaucrats of the Brussels establishment were not well disposed to us Brits, given we voted for Brexit and then had the temerity to get our vaccination programme up and running more swiftly and efficiently than the EU did. Brussels is likely to be mad at us for a long time to come.

But Ireland, we were told, was different. The EU loved Ireland. It respected Ireland. It would always stand up for Irish interests. That’s what EU spokespeople and their cheerleaders in both Dublin and London said again and again over the past couple of years. The EU absolutely would not allow Brexit to hurt Ireland. There would be no hard border, no division between north and south, no messing about with the Good Friday Agreement. No way. That was the EU’s red line, we were told.

How quickly and spectacularly that has now fallen apart. In triggering Article 16 briefly yesterday, before quickly backtracking, the EU made it clear that it is more than happy to erect a hard border in Ireland. It confirmed that it is perfectly content to ‘rip up’ the Good Friday Agreement. It revealed that it doesn’t actually care what the Irish government or the Irish people think.

The EU’s plan was clear: it wanted to enforce a vaccines border on the island of Ireland. It intended to subject Northern Ireland to its export controls on vaccines. So the Republic of Ireland, as an EU member, would have been able to receive vaccines produced in the EU, but it would not have been at liberty to transport any of them to Northern Ireland.

That’s about as hard as a border can be: one side would have been allowed to save its citizens’ lives using EU-exported vaccines; the other side would not. This runs counter to all the promises about avoiding borders and maintaining the integrity of the Single Market on the island of Ireland that the EU and its Remainer supporters made incessantly over the past three years.

Could it be that those of us who said the EU was cynically exploiting Irish concerns about the return of a hard border to gain leverage in the Brexit talks were right all along? Well, I never!

But it gets worse. The EU didn’t even consult the Irish government before it triggered Article 16. Think about the magnitude of this. The EU unilaterally decided what should happen on the island of Ireland. It decided to enforce a health border. Like the imperialists of old, it drew a line through post-Brexit Ireland, decreeing how the two parts of the country may relate to one another on the issue of Covid and vaccines.

This sums up the EU’s neo-colonial arrogance towards Ireland. It seems to view Ireland as territory that it owns. As a country in which it can do whatever it chooses. Even the EU’s later reversal does not take away from the seriousness of this — Brussels genuinely contemplated enforcing a new border arrangement on the island of Ireland without consulting Ireland’s elected representatives.

This cannot be glossed over. We cannot just say it was a rash, regrettable decision, now averted. No, we need a proper discussion about how the EU views Ireland, and whether Ireland is content to put up with the EU’s demeaning, imperious behaviour.

Ireland’s political class must now make a full-throated defence of Irish sovereignty. They must reprimand the EU for what it nearly did. If they fail to do this, then they will be sending a signal to the watching world, one that says they are happy to go from the terrible old days of being ruled by Britain to an equally undesirable situation where they are bossed around by Brussels.

There is a staggering amount of conformism in Irish political and media circles when it comes to the EU. This makes it very difficult indeed to have an open discussion about the subordination of Ireland to the writ of Brussels. I know this from personal experience.

Anyone who points out that the EU does not respect Irish democracy will be shouted down as ‘divisive’ or ‘Europhobic’. Remind people that the EU forced the Irish to vote again when they rejected the Nice and Lisbon treaties in 2001 and 2008 respectively, or that they essentially colonised Ireland’s political institutions using the Troika in 2010, and you will be told to pipe down. ‘Stop making trouble.’ And yet once again we can see how little respect the EU has for Irish sovereign rights.

Some honesty must now cut through the conformism. Ireland surely did not spend centuries struggling for independence only to submit itself to a neo-colonial institution like the EU. I, and many others, would like to see Irexit one day. But in the meantime I’d settle for Irish politicians admitting that their sovereignty is being diluted, and instituting a free, frank discussion about whether this is a good thing.
Comments

Paul 5 year ago
Some EU bureaucrat screwed up. They reversed it. Irish people see through the whole Brexit farce. The EU has its faults, but it enables us to see ourselves as a nation among equals. That’s why we like it. And that’s why the Brexiteers don’t.

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Trump Reverses Course and Criticises UK-Mauritius Chagos Islands Agreement
Elizabeth Hurley Tells UK Court of ‘Brutal’ Invasion of Privacy in Phone Hacking Case
UK Bond Yields Climb as Report Fuels Speculation Over Andy Burnham’s Return to Parliament
America’s Venezuela Oil Grip Meets China’s Demand: Market Power, Legal Shockwaves, and the New Rules of Energy Leverage
TikTok’s U.S. Escape Plan: National Security Firewall or Political Theater With a Price Tag?
Trump’s Board of Peace: Breakthrough Diplomacy or a Hostile Takeover of Global Order?
Trump’s Board of Peace: Breakthrough Diplomacy or a Hostile Takeover of Global Order?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
The Greenland Gambit: Economic Genius or Political Farce?
Will AI Finally Make Blue-Collar Workers Rich—or Is This Just Elite Tech Spin?
Prince William to Make Official Visit to Saudi Arabia in February
Prince Harry Breaks Down in London Court, Says UK Tabloids Have Made Meghan Markle’s Life ‘Absolute Misery’
Malin + Goetz UK Business Enters Administration, All Stores Close
EU and UK Reject Trump’s Greenland-Linked Tariff Threats and Pledge Unified Response
UK Deepfake Crackdown Puts Intense Pressure on Musk’s Grok AI After Surge in Non-Consensual Explicit Images
Prince Harry Becomes Emotional in London Court, Invokes Memory of Princess Diana in Testimony Against UK Tabloids
UK Inflation Rises Unexpectedly but Interest Rate Cuts Still Seen as Likely
AI vs Work: The Battle Over Who Controls the Future of Labor
Buying an Ally’s Territory: Strategic Genius or Geopolitical Breakdown?
AI Everywhere: Power, Money, War, and the Race to Control the Future
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Trump vs the World Order: Disruption Genius or Global Arsonist?
Arctic Power Grab: Security Chessboard or Climate Crime Scene?
Starmer Steps Back from Trump’s ‘Board of Peace’ Amid Strained US–UK Relations
Prince Harry’s Lawyer Tells UK Court Daily Mail Was Complicit in Unlawful Privacy Invasions
UK Government Approves China’s ‘Mega Embassy’ in London Amid Debate Over Security and Diplomacy
Trump Cites UK’s Chagos Islands Sovereignty Shift as Justification for Pursuing Greenland Acquisition
UK Government Weighs Australia-Style Social Media Ban for Under-Sixteens Amid Rising Concern Over Online Harm
Trump Aides Say U.S. Has Discussed Offering Asylum to British Jews Amid Growing Antisemitism Concerns
UK Seeks Diplomatic De-escalation with Trump Over Greenland Tariff Threat
Prince Harry Returns to London as High Court Trial Begins Over Alleged Illegal Tabloid Snooping
High-Speed Train Collision in Southern Spain Kills at Least Twenty-One and Injures Scores
Meghan Markle May Return to the U.K. This Summer as Security Review Advances
Trump’s Greenland Tariff Threat Sparks EU Response and Risks Deep Transatlantic Rift
Prince Harry’s High Court Battle With Daily Mail Publisher Begins in London
Trump’s Tariff Escalation Presents Complex Challenges for the UK Economy
UK Prime Minister Starmer Rebukes Trump’s Greenland Tariff Strategy as Transatlantic Tensions Rise
Prince Harry’s Last Press Case in UK Court Signals Potential Turning Point in Media and Royal Relations
OpenAI to Begin Advertising in ChatGPT in Strategic Shift to New Revenue Model
GDP Growth Remains the Most Telling Barometer of Britain’s Economic Health
Prince William and Kate Middleton Stay Away as Prince Harry Visits London Amid Lingering Rift
Britain Braces for Colder Weather and Snow Risk as Temperatures Set to Plunge
Mass Protests Erupt as UK Nears Decision on China’s ‘Mega Embassy’ in London
Prince Harry to Return to UK to Testify in High-Profile Media Trial Against Associated Newspapers
Keir Starmer Rejects Trump’s Greenland Tariff Threat as ‘Completely Wrong’
Trump to hit Europe with 10% tariffs until Greenland deal is agreed
Prince Harry Returns to UK High Court as Final Privacy Trial Against Daily Mail Publisher Begins
×