London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Thursday, Jul 10, 2025

Couple must pay architect £1,000,000 after suing her over free advice on garden

A couple who sued their architect friend over free advice she gave them have now ended up over £1,000,000 out of pocket.
Peter and Lynn Burgess had wanted to transform the garden of their £5,000,000 home in Highgate, north London, but thought an initial quote they were given for the work was too high.

They then asked their friend Basia Lejonvarn, 56, for advice and Polish contractors were found to carry out the work at a lower price in 2013.

But within months, the two parties had fallen out and became locked in an acrimonious ’email war’.

The builders were then ordered to stop working and the Burgesses then returned to the original gardener whose quote they had at first rejected.

The couple claimed the work then cost them £265,000 more than it would have done without their friend’s involvement.

In 2017, they sued Ms Lejonvarn, and won a Court of Appeal ruling which stated that she owed them a legal ‘duty of care’, despite only offering advice on the project for free.

But the following year the High Court dismissed the Burgesses claims, instead arguing that their claims against the architect ‘lacked credibility and conviction’.

Now Appeal Court judge Lord Justice Coulson has ordered the couple to pay legal costs at a punishing ‘indemnity’ rate, which would be over £1,000,000 – and could even reach £2,000.000.

The judge said he was making the order because the couple’s claims against their architect friend had been ‘speculative and weak’ and should have been dropped in 2017.

He also lamented the ‘huge costs’ which had been ‘racked up on both sides’.

Ms Lejonvarn had previously protested that she had only offered her advice to the couple in a ‘non-commercial, informal and social context’ about their garden.

At first, it was ruled that she ‘assumed responsibility’ for the project, until the High Court cleared her of negligence.

Ruling on costs, Lord Justice Coulson said: ‘Mr and Mrs Burgess must have known that after the Court of Appeal judgement their claims were speculative and weak and that all that really mattered now was costs.

‘From then on, they found themselves in an absurd position where they were incurring hundreds of thousands of pound on costs, solely in order to try and recover some of those costs from Ms Lejonvarn.

‘They should have called a halt, because their underlying claims were speculative and weak, but they failed to do so.’

He also noted that Ms Lejonvarn had offered to settle the case for £25,000 in March 2015 so that ‘both sides were spared the acrimony stress and expense of litigation’.

The offer was refused by Mr and Mrs Burgess.
Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Severe Heatwave Claims 2,300 Lives Across Europe
NVIDIA Achieves Historic Milestone as First Company Valued at $4 Trillion
Declining Beer Consumption Signals Cultural Shift in Germany
Linda Yaccarino Steps Down as CEO of X After Two Years
US Imposes New Tariffs on Brazilian Exports Amid Political Tensions
Azerbaijan and Armenia are on the brink of a historic peace deal.
Emails Leaked: How Passenger Luggage Became a Side Income for Airport Workers
Polish MEP: “Dear Leftists - China is laughing at you, Russia is laughing, India is laughing”
BRICS Expands Membership with Indonesia and Ten New Partner Countries
Weinstein Victim’s Lawyer Says MeToo Movement Still Strong
U.S. Enacts Sweeping Tax and Spending Legislation Amid Trade Policy Shifts
Football Mourns as Diogo Jota and Brother André Silva Laid to Rest in Portugal
Labour Expected to Withdraw Support for Special Needs Funding Model
Leaked Audio Reveals Tory Aide Defending DEI Record
Elon Musk Founds a Party Following a Poll on X: "You Wanted It – You Got It!"
London Stock Exchange Faces Historic Low in Initial Public Offerings
A new online platform has emerged in the United Kingdom, specifically targeting Muslim men seeking virgin brides
Trump Celebrates Independence Day with B-2 Flyover and Signs Controversial Legislation
Boris Johnson Urges Conservatives to Ignore Farage
SNP Ordered to Update Single-Sex Space Guidance Within Days
Starmer Set to Reject Calls for Wealth Taxes
Stolen Century-Old Rolls-Royce Recovered After Hotel Theft
Macron Presses Starmer to Recognise Palestinian State
Labour Delayed Palestine Action Ban Over Riot Concerns
Swinney’s Tax Comments ‘Offensive to Scots’, Say Tories
High Street Retailers to Enforce Bans on Serial Shoplifters
Music Banned by Henry VIII to Be Performed After 500 Years
Steve Coogan Says Working Class Is Being ‘Ethnically Cleansed’
Home Office Admits Uncertainty Over Visa Overstayer Numbers
JD Vance Questions Mandelson Over Reform Party’s Rising Popularity
Macron to Receive Windsor Carriage Ride in Royal Gesture
Labour Accused of ‘Hammering’ Scots During First Year in Power
BBC Head of Music Stood Down Amid Bob Vylan Controversy
Corbyn Eyes Hard-Left Challenge to Starmer’s Leadership
London Tube Trains Suspended After Major Fire Erupts Nearby
Richard Kemp: I Felt Safer in Israel Under Attack Than in the UK
Cyclist Says Police Cited Human Rights Act for Riding No-Handed
China’s Central Bank Consults European Peers on Low-Rate Strategies
AI Raises Alarms Over Long-Term Job Security
Saudi Arabia Maintains Ties with Iran Despite Israel Conflict
Musk Battles to Protect Tesla Amid Trump Policy Threats
Air France-KLM Acquires Majority Stake in Scandinavian Airlines
UK Educators Sound Alarm on Declining Child Literacy
Shein Fined €40 Million in France Over Misleading Discounts
Brazil’s Lula Visits Kirchner During Argentina House Arrest
Trump Scores Legislative Win as House Passes Tax Reform Bill
Keir Starmer Faces Criticism After Rocky First Year in Power
DJI Launches Heavy-Duty Coaxial Quadcopter with 80 kg Lift Capacity
U.S. Senate Approves Major Legislation Dubbed the 'Big Beautiful Bill'
Largest Healthcare Fraud Takedown in U.S. History Announced by DOJ
×