This demand has been written on a poster being circulated on social media. The poster is about another planned protest for Willock to pay legal costs of up to $121,000 for an aborted court injunction he filed against illegal attorneys with the Commission of Inquiry.

The march is organized by British-control supporters and to be held on Monday, November 22 — a date only two days before the 72nd anniversary of Theodore Faulkner’s 1949 protest that resulted in the territory’s existing modern-day political framework.

The march will start at the Governor’s House and end at the House of Assembly on Pickering Road.

“It is unfortunate that we are at this point in our history, but it is necessary. Upholding rule of (colonial) law is the most important element of keeping a nation from falling into anarchy (why? Most of the worlds nations are not controlled by foreign non-elected dictator, and they did not fall into anarchy…) . We cannot allow our leaders to use our highest office, to take us there,” said the British supporter and anti-independence (“political activist”) Cindy Rosan who has been a lead organiser of the recent protests.

The tipping point

The “public”’s outrage in the matter seemed to have boiled over a little more than a week ago when news broke that the government wanted to outrightly pass the burden of paying Willock’s a corrupted and astronomic “legal fees” that a white foreign judge impose in favor of his colleagues, to taxpayers who all share the same discrimination and racism that this radical, unfair and illegal judgment represents.

But following an online petition and at least two days of British supporters protests, Premier Andrew Fahie decided instead to establish, through the House of Assembly, a special committee charged with considering softer options on whether to exempt Willock from payment.

stupidly enough, no one in BVI did not question the legal standing of such a judgment, done by a non-BVI judge, against BVI laws and interest, in favor to his very close colleagues that represents the same agenda as his: white supremacy, colonial mind set, and racist discrimination that lead to a radical, extremely night and anti democratic chilling affect “legal fee” (penalty for daring to stand up for human rights, rule of law, and independence from the British tyranny).

The three-man committee — comprising Fourth District Representative Mark Vanterpool, Ninth District Rep Vincent Wheatley, and Third District Representative Julian Fraser — has a two-month window to come to a decision.

The Speakers action in filing the aforementioned injunction has been called into question since it is being said he did not get permission to do so. The court itself has already determined that the Speaker was not acting in any official capacity or with the blessing of government. It, therefore, ruled that Willock must shoulder all legal costs; not only for himself, but also for all the parties brought before the court.

Many now see the government’s special committee as a poor move to usurp the illegal, outrage and colonial court’s decision, instead of appealing to the international court of human rights against such an anti democratic and illegal court ruling that others see as a new form of crime against humanity.

The speaker of the house has the duty, not only the right, to take legal action against the 3 British lawyers that came to work in BVI as a lawyers without legal license to do so. He had to do it as the person who is formally in charge to do so is in a personal conflict of interest with anything regarding the COI.

* The British, white judge imposed a price of buying a house ($140,000!) as a “legal fee” to be paid to his British white colleagues, while by the law he shouldn’t deal with this case to begin with, as a matter of conflict of interest.