London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Saturday, Jul 26, 2025

Budget 2023: Pensions tax cut for all is wrong, Labour leader says

Budget 2023: Pensions tax cut for all is wrong, Labour leader says

Pension tax breaks aimed at keeping doctors in work should not have been given to all, Sir Keir Starmer has said.

It comes after Chancellor Jeremy Hunt scrapped the overall £1m lifetime limit on tax-free pensions savings in Wednesday's Budget.

The Labour leader branded the move a tax break for "the richest 1%" that showed the "wrong priorities".

He added that any pensions tweak should be "tailor-made" for doctors.

Doctors have said the current tax-free pension allowances are pushing some of them into declining overtime shifts or into early retirement.

Mr Hunt, a former health secretary, says the changes to the pension pot rules are a "very important measure to get the NHS working".

At the Budget, he announced he was abolishing the current £1.07m cap on how much individuals can build up in their private pension pots over their career without having to pay additional tax.

The annual tax-free allowance on pensions will also increase from £40,000 to £60,000.

The chancellor said the changes would stop doctors retiring early - but would also contribute to the government's wider drive to persuade retirees back into work.

"I have realised the issue goes wider than doctors. No one should be pushed out of the workforce for tax reasons," he told MPs.

The financial watchdog, the Office for Budget Responsibility, estimated the changes to the allowance would increase overall employment by 15,000 workers.

The combined cost will be more than £1.1bn a year by 2027/8, according to official estimates.


'Billion pound giveaway'


However, the decision to opt for a wider change to pension rules has been criticised by Labour, which branded it a "one billion pound pensions bung" for the wealthy.

The party has committed to overturning the government's changes if it wins power at the next general election, and replacing it with an alternative scheme just for doctors.

It has not yet offered details of its alternative approach, but has suggested it could be based on a scheme for judges introduced in 2022, under which the tax allowances are disapplied.

Shadow health secretary Wes Streeting has previously told the Telegraph in September he favoured "doing away with" the savings cap.

Speaking earlier, Mr Hunt said it suggested Mr Streeting had previously advocated the government's approach.

But Mr Streeting insisted his previous comments were about how the allowance affected doctors - and he had "consistently argued" they should have their own carve-out from the rules.

He told BBC News this would cost "a fraction" of the blanket change proposed by ministers, which he called "a sledgehammer to crack a nut".

Mr Hunt defended making a rule change across the board, arguing it was the "simplest and quickest way" to resolve the issues facing doctors.

He added that the change could be introduced in two weeks, delivering help to the NHS when it "most needs support".

He pointed to Royal College of Surgeons statistics, saying the organisation had found that 69% of their members had reduced their hours because of the "way pension taxes work".

On Wednesday, Treasury Minister John Glen said a targeted scheme risked legal challenges from other highly-paid public sector workers, such as senior civil servants.

Speaking to BBC2's Politics Live, he added that a wider change to the rules would also have a "positive effect on the economy as a whole".

The announcement was welcomed by NHS Providers, which represents hospitals in England.


'Poor value'


Chief executive Sir Julian Hartley said it would help "stem the flow of senior NHS staff either taking early retirement or not taking on extra work for fear of punitive tax bills".

But the independent Institute for Fiscal Studies said the change would "encourage a relatively small number of better-off workers to stay in the workforce a bit longer" and was "unlikely to have a big effect on overall employment".

The Resolution Foundation think tank, which focuses on people on low to middle incomes, described the policy as "hugely regressive and wasteful".

Chief executive Torsten Bell said: "It's a big victory for NHS consultants but poor value for money for Britain."

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Deputy attorney general's second day of meeting with Ghislaine Maxwell has concluded
Controversial March in Switzerland Features Men Dressed in Nazi Uniforms
Politics is a good business: Barack Obama’s Reported Net Worth Growth, 1990–2025
Thai Civilian Death Toll Rises to 12 in Cambodian Cross-Border Attacks
TSUNAMI: Trump Just Crossed the Rubicon—And There’s No Turning Back
Over 120 Criminal Cases Dismissed in Boston Amid Public Defender Shortage
UN's Top Court Declares Environmental Protection a Legal Obligation Under International Law
"Crazy Thing": OpenAI's Sam Altman Warns Of AI Voice Fraud Crisis In Banking
The Podcaster Who Accidentally Revealed He Earns Over $10 Million a Year
Trump Announces $550 Billion Japanese Investment and New Trade Agreements with Indonesia and the Philippines
US Treasury Secretary Calls for Institutional Review of Federal Reserve Amid AI‑Driven Growth Expectations
UK Government Considers Dropping Demand for Apple Encryption Backdoor
Severe Flooding in South Korea Claims Lives Amid Ongoing Rescue Operations
Japanese Man Discovers Family Connection Through DNA Testing After Decades of Separation
Russia Signals Openness to Ukraine Peace Talks Amid Escalating Drone Warfare
Switzerland Implements Ban on Mammography Screening
Japanese Prime Minister Vows to Stay After Coalition Loses Upper House Majority
Pogacar Extends Dominance with Stage Fifteen Triumph at Tour de France
CEO Resigns Amid Controversy Over Relationship with HR Executive
Man Dies After Being Pulled Into MRI Machine Due to Metal Chain in New York Clinic
NVIDIA Achieves $4 Trillion Valuation Amid AI Demand
US Revokes Visas of Brazilian Corrupted Judges Amid Fake Bolsonaro Investigation
U.S. Congress Approves Rescissions Act Cutting Federal Funding for NPR and PBS
North Korea Restricts Foreign Tourist Access to New Seaside Resort
Brazil's Supreme Court Imposes Radical Restrictions on Former President Bolsonaro
Centrist Criticism of von der Leyen Resurfaces as she Survives EU Confidence Vote
Judge Criticizes DOJ Over Secrecy in Dropping Charges Against Gang Leader
Apple Closes $16.5 Billion Tax Dispute With Ireland
Von der Leyen Faces Setback Over €2 Trillion EU Budget Proposal
UK and Germany Collaborate on Global Military Equipment Sales
Trump Plans Over 10% Tariffs on African and Caribbean Nations
Flying Taxi CEO Reclaims Billionaire Status After Stock Surge
Epstein Files Deepen Republican Party Divide
Zuckerberg Faces $8 Billion Privacy Lawsuit From Meta Shareholders
FIFA Pressured to Rethink World Cup Calendar Due to Climate Change
SpaceX Nears $400 Billion Valuation With New Share Sale
Microsoft, US Lab to Use AI for Faster Nuclear Plant Licensing
Trump Walks Back Talk of Firing Fed Chair Jerome Powell
Zelensky Reshuffles Cabinet to Win Support at Home and in Washington
"Can You Hit Moscow?" Trump Asked Zelensky To Make Putin "Feel The Pain"
Irish Tech Worker Detained 100 days by US Authorities for Overstaying Visa
Dimon Warns on Fed Independence as Trump Administration Eyes Powell’s Succession
Church of England Removes 1991 Sexuality Guidelines from Clergy Selection
Superman Franchise Achieves Success with Latest Release
Hungary's Viktor Orban Rejects Agreements on Illegal Migration
Jeff Bezos Considers Purchasing Condé Nast as a Wedding Gift
Ghislaine Maxwell Says She’s Ready to Testify Before Congress on Epstein’s Criminal Empire
Bal des Pompiers: A Celebration of Community and Firefighter Culture in France
FBI Chief Kash Patel Denies Resignation Speculations Amid Epstein List Controversy
Air India Pilot’s Mental Health Records Under Scrutiny
×