London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Friday, Aug 22, 2025

OpEd: The Anti-Mask Law for Protesters is an Illegal Law

Law should not be only right, but also smart. Controversial laws it's exactly the problem and not the solution.

The human right to protect one's body from harmful tear gas and surveillance is an integral part of the supreme freedom to peacefully protest. The government’s right to be able to restore peace and order is never in question. But new laws and limitations for Hong Kong it's part of the problem, not the solution. Obviously It will create more anger than the safety it meant to bring.

A government should not eliminate the human rights of 2 million peaceful protesters to protect one's body from harmful tear gas and surveillance just because there are among them a few thousand hooligans, criminals or terrorists - call them whatever you want.


The police have the full right - and obligation - to use reasonable force to defeat every protester who resorts to violence. That is exactly their job.

But the same police have the same right -and obligation- to protect the protesters from a government that attempts to eliminate the human rights of millions of people to protest peacefully, in order to make their job of law enforcement easier.

This law is not only crossing the inviolable line of human rights to protect one's body from harmful tear gas and surveillance - but even if you think this law is right - it is not smart.

Controversial law is what started the problem and should not be played again as the solution. It should never come to life.

Not because we support the violence protests. Opposite: I think the Hong Kong Police should get much more confidence to crack down the criminals that destroy Hong Kong with bombs and fire and violence - by all means. But do not throw the baby out with the bathwater. Do not impose laws that will make more people crazy. Do not limit the ability of the young and angry people to protest properly and peacefully.

Do not criminalize the citizens that angry but do not cross the line and do not use violence. They are the majority of these protests, and if you push them too much - you will lose the respect all the people have to the law. Many leaders try to do this mistake in the past, but they never win. Not in the Arab Spring, not in Berlin, not in USSR, not in what was British America, and... not in China 70 years ego when Mao came and lead the revolution that made China great again. Those who do not learn history are doomed to repeat it. 

Hong Kong's civil war is creating a lot of challenges, not less for the government than for the protestors.

So far, Hong Kong (and obviously China) has tolerated - amazingly, surprisingly - a huge number of illegal actions carried out repeatedly by some protesters, at a level far above what would be allowed in any other country. If these violent acts had happened in the USA or the UK, or anywhere else for that matter, then a tally of 1,000 dead protesters shot by police would be a very optimistic estimate. A death toll that would no doubt be applauded by the mainstream media as "winning the war against terrorism".

The salient fact - an amazing, surprising fact - is that the extreme violence perpetrated by some protesters and the remarkable tolerance of the authorities shows that not only Hong Kong but also China (yes, China!) has allowed its people far greater freedom of speech than would any Western country.

Of course, neither should we totally ignore the incontrovertible video evidence of several and more then just few instances of illegal violence against the protesters by very few criminals from the Hong Kong Police.


Right now, the most important and urgent challenge is not to point fingers but to find a peaceful solution, so as to relax the situation in a way that each side can forgive the wrongs done against them and move forward for the benefit of all Hong Kong.


But let's leave aside for one minute all the good things we can say about the HK Government and Police and all the bad things we can say about the minority of criminals who attack innocent people, and burn and bomb their properties.

The outlandish behavior of the extreme minority does not obscure the fact that as many as two million good, smart, well-educated, modern and loyal citizens of Hong Kong are angry, frustrated, and panicking - not just about their current lives, but about their future, and about the country they were born in and are proud to belong to.

Those decent and law-abiding people have the full right to protest, without being threatened or deterred by tear gas, labeled by face recognition technology,  or any other draconian measures.

In the light of the extreme violence and criminality -actually terrorism- of SOME of the protestors, the ban imposed by the authorities against peaceful protests is perfectly understandable. But everything that is right is smart.  

Given the choice, obviously no government would really want to allow mass protests. But every citizen has the supreme right to make their voices heard, regardless of the natural desire of governments to keep enjoying the status quo and to keep ignoring the big, deep and wide social problems that Hong Kong have, regardless the extradition bill, lack of democracy, or Mainland China controls. 

Hong Kong's situation is bad enough as it is. Going forward, any mistake that crosses the line - by government, police or protesters - might escalate the situation to a tragic and irreversible point.

At such a sensitive juncture, a wise government should not attempt to impose laws and orders that will obviously be broken by the masses.

Hasty and ill-thought out legislation will not prevent protesters from protecting themselves with gas masks, but will instead destroy respect for law and order in general. If reactive and repressive new laws don't make sense - and should be rightfully broken - who can guarantee that the rest of the laws will remain holy?

The need to use facial recognition technology to identify and classify protesters is understandable. Everybody wants to know everything about the others and love to protect its own secrets.

Equally, the protesters would love to have the ability to identify with face recognition and to separate out from the world-renowned and generally excellent Kong Kong Police Force the few but bad criminal policemen who have used unnecessary violence against protesters, and to have them punished properly.

But there is a fine, fine line that no one should cross:

The police should never forget that their obligation is not only to protect the government from the people, but also to protect the people from the government.

And, no matter how terrible the conflict or how bad the situation, they must never forget the difference between the right to use power and the wrong to abuse power.

The Anti-mask law is a clear abuse of power and is illegitimately exposing the peaceful protesters to illegal tear gas and illegal surveillance.

To repeat - and let's never forget it - the peaceful protesters have rights that are above any law: human rights.

One of these rights is not to be labelled and categorized in the same pack as the criminal and terrorist protesters. At the end of the day, the decent, peaceful and angry protesters know very well that the violence of the extremists is not part of the Hong Kong they want, whereas the good old Hong Kong Police is exactly what they want, as soon as life gets back to normal.

Cancel this law. Right now, Hong Kong needs peace, not controversial, provocative new actions.

The fact that some other Western countries have this law doesn't make it right. Hong Kong should cherry pick the best examples from every country, and not inflict on its people the bad laws that regrettably every good country also has.



Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Ukraine Declares De Facto War on Hungary and Slovakia with Terror Drone Strikes on Their Gas Lifeline
Animated K-pop Musical ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Becomes Netflix’s Most-Watched Original Animated Film
New York Appeals Court Voids Nearly $500 Million Civil Fraud Penalty Against Trump While Upholding Fraud Liability
Elon Musk tweeted, “Europe is dying”
Far-Right Activist Convicted of Incitement Changes Gender and Demands: "Send Me to a Women’s Prison" | The Storm in Germany
Hungary Criticizes Ukraine: "Violating Our Sovereignty"
Will this be the first country to return to negative interest rates?
Child-free hotels spark controversy
North Korea is where this 95-year-old wants to die. South Korea won’t let him go. Is this our ally or a human rights enemy?
Hong Kong Launches Regulatory Regime and Trials for HKD-Backed Stablecoins
China rehearses September 3 Victory Day parade as imagery points to ‘loyal wingman’ FH-97 family presence
Trump Called Viktor Orbán: "Why Are You Using the Veto"
Horror in the Skies: Plane Engine Exploded, Passengers Sent Farewell Messages
MSNBC Rebrands as MS NOW Amid Comcast’s Cable Spin-Off
AI in Policing: Draft One Helps Speed Up Reports but Raises Legal and Ethical Concerns
Shame in Norway: Crown Princess’s Son Accused of Four Rapes
Apple Begins Simultaneous iPhone 17 Production in India and China
A Robot to Give Birth: The Chinese Announcement That Shakes the World
Finnish MP Dies by Suicide in Parliament Building
Outrage in the Tennis World After Jannik Sinner’s Withdrawal Storm
William and Kate Are Moving House – and the New Neighbors Were Evicted
Class Action Lawsuit Against Volkswagen: Steering Wheel Switches Cause Accidents
Taylor Swift on the Way to the Super Bowl? All the Clues Stirring Up Fans
Dogfights in the Skies: Airbus on Track to Overtake Boeing and Claim Aviation Supremacy
Tim Cook Promises an AI Revolution at Apple: "One of the Most Significant Technologies of Our Generation"
Apple Expands Social Media Presence in China With RedNote Account Ahead of iPhone 17 Launch
Are AI Data Centres the Infrastructure of the Future or the Next Crisis?
Cambridge Dictionary Adds 'Skibidi,' 'Delulu,' and 'Tradwife' Amid Surge of Online Slang
Bill Barr Testifies No Evidence Implicated Trump in Epstein Case; DOJ Set to Release Records
Zelenskyy Returns to White House Flanked by European Allies as Trump Pressures Land-Swap Deal with Putin
The CEO Who Replaced 80% of Employees for the AI Revolution: "I Would Do It Again"
Emails Worth Billions: How Airlines Generate Huge Profits
Character.ai Bets on Future of AI Companionship
China Ramps Up Tax Crackdown on Overseas Investments
Japanese Office Furniture Maker Expands into Bomb Shelter Market
Intel Shares Surge on Possible U.S. Government Investment
Hurricane Erin Threatens U.S. East Coast with Dangerous Surf
EU Blocks Trade Statement Over Digital Rule Dispute
EU Sends Record Aid as Spain Battles Wildfires
JPMorgan Plans New Canary Wharf Tower
Zelenskyy and his allies say they will press Trump on security guarantees
Beijing is moving into gold and other assets, diversifying away from the dollar
Escalating Clashes in Serbia as Anti-Government Protests Spread Nationwide
The Drought in Britain and the Strange Request from the Government to Delete Old Emails
Category 5 Hurricane in the Caribbean: 'Catastrophic Storm' with Winds of 255 km/h
"No, Thanks": The Mathematical Genius Who Turned Down 1.5 Billion Dollars from Zuckerberg
The surprising hero, the ugly incident, and the criticism despite victory: "Liverpool’s defense exposed in full"
Digital Humans Move Beyond Sci-Fi: From Virtual DJs to AI Customer Agents
YouTube will start using AI to guess your age. If it’s wrong, you’ll have to prove it
Jellyfish Swarm Triggers Shutdown at Gravelines Nuclear Power Station in Northern France
×