London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Wednesday, Oct 22, 2025

The government was set to protect man from criminals, and Constitution is written to protect man from the government

Unlike most modern states, Britain does not have a codified constitution but instead an unwritten, volatile, erratic, random and liquid melange formed of Acts of Parliament, court judgments and conventions. This produces a constitutional fog, shaped by another random mixture – this time of personalities and moods - which delivers outcomes bearing far more resemblance to those of a casino than to the neat and proper rule of law and order. Brexit is the prime example why the UK should now have a written constitution.

"The government was set to protect man from criminals, and the Constitution was written to protect man from the government" (Ayn Rand)

 

The Constitution is important because it protects freedom, and its fundamental principles govern the country. The Constitution places the government's power in the hands of the citizens. It limits the power of the government and establishes a system of checks and balances.

The United Kingdom does not have a constitution at all in the sense most commonly used around the world: a document of fundamental importance setting out the structure of government and its relationship with its citizens. All modern states, saving only the UK, New Zealand and Israel, have adopted a documentary constitution of this kind. The first and most complete model being that of the United States of America in 1788. Britain,however, proudly proclaims that it has a constitution, albeit one that exists only in an abstract virtual and unclear sense, comprising a host of diverse laws, practices and conventions that have evolved over a long period of time.

Sitting comfortably in the comfort zone, accepting the status quo, resisting change, and refusing to contemplate alternative solutions results in complacency and a headlong march in one direction - down the slippery slope to failure. And this is exactly where the UK has been heading for the past 3 years.


The key milestone was the Bill of Rights (1689), which established the supremacy of Parliament over the Crown following the forcible replacement of King James II (r. 1685–88) by William III (r. 1689–1702) and Mary (r. 1689–94) in the Glorious Revolution (1688). Surely enough years have passed since the last changes for it to be time to modernise the UK's democratic system?

From a comparative perspective, the UK has what is known as an ‘unwritten constitution’ (although some prefer to describe it as ‘uncodified’, on the basis that many of the UK’s laws of a constitutional nature are in fact written down in Acts of Parliament or in the law reports of court judgments). This aspect of the British constitution, its unwritten nature, is its most distinguishing characteristic.


And, in the great buffet of life, this is what the UK's unwritten constitution looks like: a salad made from healthy vegetables that somehow politics, money, and the legal actors always manage to ruin with the wrong spices.


Why doesn't the UK have a written constitution?

Essentially because the country has been too stable for too long. The governing elites of many European nations, such as France and Germany, were forced to draw up their constitutions in response to popular revolts or the outcomes of war.

 

Great Britain, by contrast, remained free of the revolutionary fervour that swept much of the Continent in the 19th century. As a result, this country's democracy has been reformed incrementally over centuries rather than in one big bang.

 

For younger countries, including the United States and Australia, codification of their citizens' rights and political systems was an essential step towards independence. Ironically, several based their written constitutions on Britain's unwritten version.


What are the disadvantages?

The people who hold the reins of power naturally resist any updates and upgrades to a system that was designed hundreds years ego. The people resisting change may simply be the victimsof bad habits. Habit, like gravity, never takes a day off.

 

"It it ain't broke, don't fix it," argue opponents of a written constitution, insisting that the existing arrangements, however piecemeal their development has been, have worked well in practice. There are, moreover, formidable practical problems to be overcome before such a document could be drawn up. Would it be wide-ranging and largely abstract or would it list individuals' rights in detail and provide an exhaustive summary of Britain's constitutional settlement? If the latter, it could prove beyond the grasp of most of the citizens it would be designed to protect.

 

Professor Robert Hazell, the director of the Constitution Unit at University College London, predicted Britain would never get a written constitution. "Constitutions don't get written in cold blood." Nick Herbert, the shadow Justice Secretary, was equally sceptical. "The last thing Britain needs, with 2,000 years of history behind us, is more of New Labour's blind constitutional vandalism," he said.

 


Should the UK have a written constitution?

Should the UK now take steps to codify all its laws, rules and conventions governing the government of the country into one comprehensive document - a new Magna Carta’? The case for a written UK constitution has been debated at UK universities and by politicians of all parties for several decades, and was the subject of a House of Commons committee inquiry during the 2010–15 Parliament.

 

The Brexit  turmoil, chaos, confusion and disorder is proof that Britain should renounce its governmental primitiveness and adopt an orderly written constitution that regulates the power relations between government institutions and ensure that the supreme ruler of the law is the citizenry rather than the politicians and legal experts whose interests and actions are not necessarily in the public and the kingdom’s interests.

 

If a written constitution for the future is to be prepared, it must be one that engages and involves everyone, especially young people, and not simply legal experts and parliamentarians. Some of the mystique and charm of an ancient constitution might be lost in the process, but a written constitution could bring the government and the governed closer together, above all by making the rules by which the UK's political democracy operates more accessible and intelligible to all.


Brexit Chaos

On the other side of the Atlantic, the constitutional crisis provoked by Boris Johnson’s decision to suspend the British parliament led to confusion, intrigue, and a certain amount of gloating.

 

In the US, it was argued, this couldn’t happen because the Founding Fathers, in all their wisdom, sat down in 1787 and wrote everything down. The US Constitution and the Bill of Rights have been the basis of American politics ever since.

 

Britain, by contrast, is one of only a handful of nations that has an uncodified constitution. While it is often described as unwritten, that is not strictly true: the UK is governed by statutes, laws and precedents that date back hundreds of years. They’re just not all in the same place. Like a very large, very well-shuffled deck of cards. More often than not, this random deck is used to serve the interests of the people in power rather than for the benefit of the country, the monarchy and its citizens. Those holding the deck simply pull out the card which best suits their needs. Sometimes it’s a joker.


Despite Britain being a parliamentary democracy, laws still have to be given Royal Assent by the Queen - and while, theoretically, she could say no, in reality, no monarch has declined to sign a bill since 1708.

 

Boris Johnson’s critics accused the prime minister of orchestrating a coup last week when he decided to prorogue - or suspend - parliament for around five weeks until mid-October, ahead of the Brexit deadline on October 31.

 

Johnson - rightly, as it happens - pointed out that as a new prime minister he is perfectly entitled to request a Queen’s speech on October 14, and that it is entirely normal for parliament to be prorogued for between two and five weeks prior to that speech being given.


A legal appeal - one of three - to be filed against the decision was on Friday rejected by the High Court and will now be taken to the Supreme Court. Over the centuries, Britain’s unwritten constitution has been written in the courts - by non-elected officers, if you please - and it is being written again, in the courts,right now.

 

Now the Opposition, with the backing of 21 Conservative rebels, have voted through legislation (pending Royal Assent) that would require Johnson to ask the EU for an extension of the Brexit deadline. He has said he will refuse. Does he have to? And if he doesn’t - what then?

 

The problem with an uncodified constitution is that it relies on the parties involved to continue to respect it. If they don’t, a constitutional crisis ensues. If there is a vote of no confidence in Boris Johnson and he refuses to resign, the UK is in uncharted territory, without a map.

 

“This is fundamental to how the relationship between government and parliament has been understood in the UK,” says Daniel Gover, lecturer in British politics at the Queen Mary University of London, “[but] it is not written down anywhere as a legal requirement.”


'Constitutional outrage'


Green Party MP Caroline Lucas, speaking in parliament this week, said that the events of recent weeks demonstrated - yet again, in her view - that Britain needs a written constitution. She said that suspending parliament was a “constitutional outrage” - and at least some Tories agree.

 

More recently the speaker of the house, John Bercow, said that a Royal Commission should be set up to explore whether the UK needed a constitution or Bill of Rights.

 

"We would not be having [this] discussion if we had a remotely codified form of constitution that would be essential in the vast majority of democracies," Bercow said at the annual Bingham lecture in London.

 

Rebel MP Caroline Nokes, who had the party whip withdrawn, told Euronews that it was the suspension of parliament that provoked her to defy Johnson over Brexit: “People have their members of parliament in order to hold the executive to account,” she said.

 

Patrick Dunleavy, professor of political science and public policy at the London School of Economics, wrote recently that Britain’s “unfixed constitution” had been exploited to the extent that it was neither a guarantor of democratic responsibility nor a check on executive power.

 

“A great deal of faith was placed in British elites’ developed respect for parliament, for public opinion and for legality [...] .Precious little now remains of such glib and overly-optimistic voices,” he wrote.




Bottom line:

“Resisting change is like holding your breath. If you succeed, you die.” (Franklin Delano Roosevelt)

In the past 100 years we have revolutionized our world with innovations like automobiles, aeroplanes, computers, mobile phones, antibiotics and nano-technology. But Britain's democratic system of government have made no innovation at all. No progress in 300 years or more. ThUK’s Democracy is desperately in need of an upgrade. Because more and more people are losing their trust in the democratic system and are fast turning to alternative ways to manage society. The gap between thought and action, between belief and will, prevents us solving our most pressing individual and societal problems. So this is a wake-upcall, to upgrade and update the UK’s democracy, before we lose it all. I am not suggesting revolution, but a sensible, step by step evolution.

 

The United Kingdom needs to learn from the civil revolt currently taking place in Hong Kong, and to avoid pushing its citizens into a similar state of despair, with them losing confidence in government institutions and losing trust in Parliament's commitment to uphold voter will.

 

The big question, of course, is how the UK could even begin to put a new constitution together.

 

When James Madison led the drafting of the US constitution in 1787, America was a country of four million people - the UK today is closer to 70 million.But more important than that, the UK is a country that is irreconcilably divided, with a parliament that for three years has been unable to agree on a path forward, andopposing political parties with huge ideological differences

 

How could it now sit down and hash out a document that should govern the nation for decades, centuries, millennia?





Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Apple Challenges EU Digital Markets Act Crackdown in Landmark Court Battle
Nicolas Sarkozy begins five-year prison term at La Santé in Paris
Japan stocks surge to record as Sanae Takaichi becomes Prime Minister
This Is How the 'Heist of the Century' Was Carried Out at the Louvre in Seven Minutes: France Humiliated as Crown with 2,000 Diamonds Vanishes
China Warns UK of ‘Consequences’ After Delay to London Embassy Approval
France’s Wealthy Shift Billions to Luxembourg and Switzerland Amid Tax and Political Turmoil
"Sniper Position": Observation Post Targeting 'Air Force One' Found Before Trump’s Arrival in Florida
Shouting Match at the White House: 'Trump Cursed, Threw Maps, and Told Zelensky – "Putin Will Destroy You"'
Windows’ Own ‘Siri’ Has Arrived: You Can Now Talk to Your Computer
Thailand and Singapore Investigate Cambodian-Based Prince Group as U.S. and U.K. Sanctions Unfold
‘No Kings’ Protests Inflate Numbers — But History Shows Nations Collapse Without Strong Executive Power
Chinese Tech Giants Halt Stablecoin Launches After Beijing’s Regulatory Intervention
Manhattan Jury Holds BNP Paribas Liable for Enabling Sudanese Government Abuses
Trump Orders Immediate Release of Former Congressman George Santos After Commuting Prison Sentence
S&P Downgrades France’s Credit Rating, Citing Soaring Debt and Political Instability
Ofcom Rules BBC’s Gaza Documentary ‘Materially Misleading’ Over Narrator’s Hamas Ties
Diane Keaton’s Cause of Death Revealed as Pneumonia, Family Confirms
Former Lostprophets Frontman Ian Watkins Stabbed to Death in British Prison
"The Tsunami Is Coming, and It’s Massive": The World’s Richest Man Unveils a New AI Vision
Outsider, Heroine, Trailblazer: Diane Keaton Was Always a Little Strange — and Forever One of a Kind
Dramatic Development in the Death of 'Mango' Founder: Billionaire's Son Suspected of Murder
Two Years of Darkness: The Harrowing Testimonies of Israeli Hostages Emerging From Gaza Captivity
EU Moves to Use Frozen Russian Assets to Buy U.S. Weapons for Ukraine
Europe Emerges as the Biggest Casualty in U.S.-China Rare Earth Rivalry
HSBC Confronts Strategic Crossroads as NAB Seeks Only Retail Arm in Australia Exit
U.S. Chamber Sues Trump Over $100,000 H-1B Visa Fee
Shenzhen Expo Spotlights China’s Quantum Step in Semiconductor Self-Reliance
China Accelerates to the Forefront in Global Nuclear Fusion Race
Yachts, Private Jets, and a Picasso Painting: Exposed as 'One of the Largest Frauds in History'
Australia’s Wedgetail Spies Aid NATO Response as Russian MiGs Breach Estonian Airspace
McGowan Urges Chalmers to Cut Spending Over Tax Hike to Close $20 Billion Budget Gap
Victoria Orders Review of Transgender Prison Placement Amid Safety Concerns for Female Inmates
U.S. Treasury Mobilises New $20 Billion Debt Facility to Stabilise Argentina
French Business Leaders Decry Budget as Macron’s Pro-Enterprise Promise Undermined
Trump Claims Modi Pledged India Would End Russian Oil Imports Amid U.S. Tariff Pressure
Surging AI Startup Valuations Fuel Bubble Concerns Among Top Investors
Australian Punter Archie Wilson Tears Up During Nebraska Press Conference, Sparking Conversation on Male Vulnerability
Australia Confirms U.S. Access to Upgraded Submarine Shipyard Under AUKUS Deal
“Firepower” Promised for Ukraine as NATO Ministers Meet — But U.S. Tomahawks Remain Undecided
Brands Confront New Dilemma as Extremists Adopt Fashion Labels
The Sydney Sweeney and Jeans Storm: “The Outcome Surpassed Our Wildest Dreams”
Erika Kirk Delivers Moving Tribute at White House as Trump Awards Charlie Presidential Medal of Freedom
British Food Influencer ‘Big John’ Detained in Australia After Visa Dispute
ScamBodia: The Chinese Fraud Empire Shielded by Cambodia’s Ruling Elite
French PM Suspends Macron’s Pension Reform Until After 2027 in Bid to Stabilize Government
Orange, Bouygues and Free Make €17 Billion Bid for Drahi’s Altice France Telecom Assets
Dutch Government Seizes Chipmaker After U.S. Presses for Removal of Chinese CEO
Bessent Accuses China of Dragging Down Global Economy Amid New Trade Curbs
U.S. Revokes Visas of Foreign Nationals Who ‘Celebrated’ Charlie Kirk’s Assassination
AI and Cybersecurity at Forefront as GITEX Global 2025 Kicks Off in Dubai
×