London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Saturday, May 31, 2025

Court upholds right of male villagers to seek to build on Hong Kong land

Court upholds right of male villagers to seek to build on Hong Kong land

But right is an ‘inherently imperfect’ one because it has never had statutory basis and is subject to discretion of Lands Department, judges find.

Hong Kong’s top court has ruled that male indigenous villagers have a constitutionally protected right to apply to build small houses on their ancestral or government-granted land, ending the debate on the legality of the controversial policy.

Applicant Kwok Cheuk-kin had argued that the so-called ding right, which allows the villagers to apply for permission to build three-storey homes in the New Territories, was discriminatory on the basis of sex, birth or social origin.

But both the government and the Heung Yee Kuk, the rural powerhouse representing villagers’ interests, countered it was one of “the lawful traditional rights and interests of the indigenous inhabitants” protected by Article 40 of the Basic Law, the city’s mini-constitution.

Kwok Cheuk-kin outside the Court of Final Appeal earlier this month.


In dismissing Kwok’s challenge, the Court of Final Appeal on Friday acknowledged that calls to axe the policy, which the British colonial government created, were made in the run-up to the promulgation of the Basic Law.

“[Article 40] marked the rejection of these demands,” the 34-page judgment read.

But the court also noted that the protection only stood while the policy remained in force as it currently existed, adding the right was an “inherently imperfect” one because it had never had a statutory basis and was subject to the discretion of the Lands Department.

“Unless [Article 40] makes the small-house policy immutable (a question which we do not decide), [the policy] may change,” the judgment read.

Kwok said he was “rather surprised” by what he described as an unreasonable judgment as it upheld discrimination against women. Although the ruling brought to an end a battle he first started in 2015, he pledged to try one more option: writing to the National People’s Congress Standing Committee, China’s top legislative body, to ask for an interpretation of the Basic Law.

“This is for the entire country,” he said.

A spokesman for the Development Bureau said the government welcomed the court’s decision and authorities would continue to receive and process applications to build the small houses.

Kuk chairman Kenneth Lau Ip-keung said the group was “happy” with the ruling.

“We hope this will serve as a foundation to free up more land in the New Territories. Since these village lands are already in a very convenient area, next to MTR stations or next to the city, we’re willing to explore this opportunity to make use of the land to build more housing for Hong Kong,” he said.

Lau also urged the government to speed up processing of construction applications, noting about 10,000 applications were still pending approval. Only 200 requests were allowed in 2020, or about a fifth the usual number, he added.

Brian Wong Shiu-hung, a member of the Liber Research Community land concern group, said the ruling was a “victory” for the government but only a “partial win” for the kuk.

“Heung Yee Kuk wanted to argue that ding is their personal right or entitlement, but the court ruling says very clearly that they only have the right to apply [to build a small house]. Approval is based on government discretion, so the policy is still subject to control,” he said.

Formulated by the British colonial administration in 1972, the policy is widely seen as unfair in a city that is constantly starved for space. Kwok, a retired civil servant whose frequent challenges to the government has earned him the nickname of “king of judicial reviews”, applied for a judicial review in 2015 after 11 indigenous villagers were jailed for up to three years for a scam in which they sold their land rights for profit.

He scored a partial victory in 2019 when the Court of First Instance held that private treaty grants and exchanges – involving land granted by, or exchanged with, the government – were not protected by Article 40 and therefore unconstitutional. All of the parties appealed.

Earlier this year, the Court of Appeal concluded that the policy was constitutional in its entirety, overturning the findings in respect of private treaty grants and exchanges, while upholding as a traceable traditional right the licence to freely build on private land.

Kwok had almost given up his battle when the top court waived the HK$4.8 million (US$616,770) he needed to pay in security for costs, considering his bankruptcy and the public interest involved in the case.

At a hearing last month, Kwok’s lawyers had argued that the anti-discrimination provisions in the Basic Law and the Hong Kong Bill of Rights qualified and limited the scope of Article 40, while the respondents countered it was the other way round.

On Friday, the court concluded that the latter view was correct, given that “the specific prevails over the general” as a principle of statutory construction and Article 40 was a specific provision dealing with the special position of a particular class of people.

“Absent [Article 40], all the various advantages enjoyed by the indigenous inhabitants of the New Territories would be inherently discriminatory unless they can be objectively justified as being necessary in pursuit of a legitimate aim,” the court said.

As to what qualified as traditional rights, the judges said the lower appellate court was right in ruling that they referred to ones recognised as traditional in April 1990, when the Basic Law was promulgated.

“[The ding right was] traditional in 1990 not because they were traceable to any rights or interests … but because the beneficiaries were confined to members of long-standing and relatively immobile village communities which had been treated as a separate category throughout the period of colonial government, and because they had by then passed through the male line in the same families for nearly nine decades,” the judges continued.

But the court also dismissed suggestions from the respondents that the policy could not be challenged by a “busybody” such as Kwok after an exceptional delay, ruling he had sufficient standing because the only people who would have a greater interest in the matter were beneficiaries who clearly had no interest in challenging it.

“It cannot be right to allow the executive to continue to act unlawfully, simply because no one challenged it at the outset,” the judgment continued.

The five judges presiding over the appeal were Chief Justice Andrew Cheung Kui-nung, permanent judges Roberto Ribeiro and Joseph Fok, and non-permanent judges Patrick Chan Siu-oi and Lord Jonathan Sumption.

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Satirical Sketch Sparks Political Spouse Feud in South Korea
Indonesia Quarry Collapse Leaves Multiple Dead and Missing
South Korean Election Video Pulled Amid Misogyny Outcry
Asian Economies Shift Away from US Dollar Amid Trade Tensions
Netflix Investigates Allegations of On-Set Mistreatment in K-Drama Production
US Defence Chief Reaffirms Strong Ties with Singapore Amid Regional Tensions
Vietnam Faces Strategic Dilemma Over China's Mekong River Projects
Malaysia's First AI Preacher Sparks Debate on Islamic Principles
White House Press Secretary Criticizes Harvard Funding, Advocates for Vocational Training
France to Implement Nationwide Smoking Ban in Outdoor Spaces Frequented by Children
Meta and Anduril Collaborate on AI-Driven Military Augmented Reality Systems
Russia's Fossil Fuel Revenues Approach €900 Billion Since Ukraine Invasion
U.S. Justice Department Reduces American Bar Association's Role in Judicial Nominations
U.S. Department of Energy Unveils 'Doudna' Supercomputer to Advance AI Research
U.S. SEC Dismisses Lawsuit Against Binance Amid Regulatory Shift
Alcohol Industry Faces Increased Scrutiny Amid Health Concerns
Italy Faces Population Decline Amid Youth Emigration
U.S. Goods Imports Plunge Nearly 20% Amid Tariff Disruptions
OpenAI Faces Competition from Cheaper AI Rivals
Foreign Tax Provision in U.S. Budget Bill Alarms Investors
Trump Accuses China of Violating Trade Agreement
Gerry Adams Wins Libel Case Against BBC
Russia Accuses Serbia of Supplying Arms to Ukraine
EU Central Bank Pushes to Replace US Dollar with Euro as World’s Main Currency
Chinese Woman Dies After Being Forced to Visit Bank Despite Critical Illness
President Trump Grants Full Pardons to Reality TV Stars Todd and Julie Chrisley
Texas Enacts App Store Accountability Act Mandating Age Verification
U.S. Health Secretary Ends Select COVID-19 Vaccine Recommendations
Vatican Calls for Sustainable Tourism in 2025 Message
Trump Warns Putin Is 'Playing with Fire' Amid Escalating Ukraine Conflict
India and Pakistan Engage Trump-Linked Lobbyists to Influence U.S. Policy
U.S. Halts New Student Visa Interviews Amid Enhanced Security Measures
Trump Administration Cancels $100 Million in Federal Contracts with Harvard
SpaceX Starship Test Flight Ends in Failure, Mars Mission Timeline Uncertain
King Charles Affirms Canadian Sovereignty Amid U.S. Statehood Pressure
Trump Threatens 25% Tariff on iPhones Amid Dispute with Apple CEO
Putin's Helicopter Reportedly Targeted by Ukrainian Drones
Liverpool Car Ramming Incident Leaves Multiple Injured
Australia Faces Immigration Debate Following Labor Party Victory
Iranian Revolutionary Guard Founder Warns Against Trusting Regime in Nuclear Talks
Macron Dismisses Viral Video of Wife's Gesture as Playful Banter
Cleveland Clinic Study Questions Effectiveness of Recent Flu Vaccine
Netanyahu Accuses Starmer of Siding with Hamas
Junior Doctors Threaten Strike Over 4% Pay Offer
Labour MPs Urge Chancellor to Tax Wealthy Over Cutting Welfare
Publication of UK Child Poverty Strategy Delayed Until Autumn
France Detains UK Fishing Vessel Amid Post-Brexit Tensions
Calls Grow to Resume Syrian Asylum Claims in UK
Nigel Farage Pledges to Reinstate Winter Fuel Payments
Boris and Carrie Johnson Welcome Daughter Poppy
×