London Daily

Focus on the big picture.

Against the law: why judges are under attack, by the Secret Barrister

Against the law: why judges are under attack, by the Secret Barrister

Branded ‘enemies of the people’ by the media and falsely accused of taking sides in Brexit by Conservative ministers, the judiciary is under threat - as is democracy
Critics of the prime minister tend to deride him as inconsistent; a popularity obsessed, anthropomorphised Groucho Marx quote for whom fidelity to principle can never trump fidelity to self-interest. But in Boris Johnson’s defence, there is one belief to which he has remained steadfast over the past 12 months: his determination to control the independent judiciary.

His interest in the justice system was trailed in his final Telegraph columns last summer, in which he filed falsehood-strewn clickbait railing against our “crook-coddling criminal justice system” and vowing to “root out the leftist culture of so much of the criminal justice establishment”.

However, since entering Downing Street he has found himself moved, both by experience and by the counsel of that ubiquitous Unnamed Downing Street Source, to train his attentions more broadly.

The problem with our justice system, it has been decreed, is the judiciary. Cue the anonymous and self-aggrandising media briefing that the PM’s chief adviser Dominic Cummings “wants to get the judges sorted”.

The course was set at the beginning of Johnson’s premiership when he unlawfully prorogued parliament and then sent out pliant ministers to spread misinformation about the judges who had dared point this out, from the business minister Kwasi Kwarteng telling the BBC that “many people … are saying that the judges are biased” to Johnson’s own response when asked about the supreme court decision, chuntering: “There are a lot of people who want to frustrate Brexit.”

It was back on 23 June 2016 that more than 17.4 million voters expressed their desire to leave the European Union in a referendum referred to by Prime Minister Theresa May in 2019 as “the biggest democratic exercise in our country’s history”.

Just over four months later three unelected judges apparently attempted to overturn the democratically expressed will of the British people.

Ruling on judicial review proceedings brought by Gina Miller, the high court judges held that the process for giving notification to leave the EU under article 50 of the Lisbon treaty legally required an act of parliament, and that the notice to withdraw could not be given by the government using its prerogative powers.

The front page of the Daily Mail the following day made a statement that echoed around the world. “ENEMIES OF THE PEOPLE” was emblazoned above photographs of the three judges involved.

A profile of each was provided on the Mail’s website: “One founded a EUROPEAN law group, another charged the taxpayer millions for advice and the third is an openly gay ex-Olympic fencer.”

The Telegraph opted for a similar front page: “Judges vs the people”. Sajid Javid, then communities secretary, told the BBC’s Question Time that “This is an attempt to frustrate the will of the British people and it is unacceptable.”

When May was asked whether she was concerned about the impact of the Mail’s headlines, she chided: “It is important that we have a free press.”

On 24 January 2017, the supreme court upheld the decision of the high court. As rage swirled on social media and Nigel Farage accused the “establishment” of trying to “frustrate” Brexit, Iain Duncan Smith declared that the decision had created “real constitutional issues about who is supreme”.

As the future foreign secretary Dominic Raab soberly warned, an “unholy alliance of diehard Remain campaigners, a fund manager [and] an unelected judiciary” had “thwart[ed] the wishes of the British public”.

Where to start with the errors strewn throughout this reporting and commentary? On no possible interpretation of the judgments did either the high court or the supreme court “block Brexit”. They simply delineated how, as a matter of law, Brexit could be achieved – a route that the government duly followed and accomplished within two months.

Similarly, the courts were not “straying into political territory”. As the high court judgment clearly stated, all sides to the litigation, including the government, agreed that the case raised “a justiciable question which it is for the courts to decide”, and one which was “a pure question of law”.

But the reporting and commentary betrayed a fundamental misunderstanding of how our constitution actually works. Concepts that are merrily tossed around in political discourse as if commonly and widely understood – such as parliamentary sovereignty, the separation of powers and judicial independence: the cornerstones of our democracy – were on this occasion so poorly discussed that it suggested widespread unfamiliarity among the political class with the very basics of how our country operates.

On the last of those three concepts, judicial independence, there was an even graver problem. The reaction to this entire episode, by ministers, parliamentarians, media and the public, exemplified a sprawling global phenomenon in which the independence of the judiciary is under direct attack.

We have all been fed accusations against lily-livered liberal judges prioritising the rights of illegal immigrants, money-grabbing compensation claimants and career criminals over the law-abiding British public.

But the “Enemies of the People” headline and associated commentary, personally attacking the individual judges, felt like a significant, emblematic moment; a sudden, choking realisation of how careless we have been in our treatment of our constitutional principles, and how close we might be creeping to doing irreparable damage to the framework of our democracy.

Johnson’s government charted a deliberately provocative course against the judiciary in September 2019, after the supreme court unanimously ruled that the prime minister had acted unlawfully in advising the Queen to prorogue parliament.

A brief reminder of those inconvenient facts: Johnson advised the Queen to prorogue parliament for an unprecedented five weeks in the run-up to “Brexit Day”, briefing in the press that this had nothing to do with stifling parliamentary scrutiny of his plans to force a “no deal” exit from the EU, and was instead all to do with preparing a Queen’s Speech.

He then refused to sign a witness statement confirming this on oath, or indeed to offer any reason to the courts for the prorogation. The supreme court ruled that proroguing parliament, and thereby preventing MPs from holding the government to account, with “no reason, let alone a good reason” was unlawful.

The supreme court’s unanimous judgment, delivered by Lady Hale, was damning for the government. Parliamentary sovereignty and parliamentary accountability, the foundational principles of our constitution, could be undermined if the government was able to prorogue parliament without any legal limit. There must, therefore, in order to maintain parliamentary sovereignty, be some legal limit on the power to prorogue.

As with the Miller decision, three years earlier, the ruling was quickly, falsely, reframed as the judges taking sides on Brexit. Leader of the House of Commons Jacob Rees-Mogg denounced the judges as having effected “a constitutional coup”.

In truth, while a judgment of enormous significance, the decision simply involved the application of established principles of common law to a novel situation. The government’s response, rather than apologising for having given the Queen unlawful advice, was to attack the judges who pointed this out.

Since the turn of the year, there has been a series of high-profile court decisions in which judicial reviews have confirmed that the government has acted unlawfully.

In February, the court of appeal ruled against the Home Office when it attempted to deport 25 convicted Jamaican nationals, having detained them in conditions where they could not access legal advice. Cummings’s response was to demand “urgent action on the farce that judicial review has become”.

Last month, the court of appeal ruled that British-born Shamima Begum ought to be permitted to return to the UK from a Syrian refugee camp to appeal against the Home Office’s decision to deprive her of her British citizenship, the Home Office’s own lawyers having accepted that she could not otherwise possibly have a “fair and effective” hearing.

Johnson told the Sunday Telegraph that the solution to such pesky judicial interference might be to deprive Begum and those like her of legal aid. Having pondered whether “judicial review does indeed go too far”, he declared it “odd and perverse” that as a nation we allow those whose lives are seriously affected by executive fiat to have access to legal redress.

It is with such high regard for our fundamental constitutional principles that the government has just announced the composition of the commission on the constitution, rights and democracy, following through on its 2019 manifesto commitment to hold a constitutional review to “restore trust in democracy” by ensuring that judicial review “is not abused to conduct politics by another means”.

The problem, of course, is that “conducting politics by other means” is a misrepresentation of the purpose and operation of judicial review. Public authorities must act within the law.

If they do not, judicial review exists as the corrective. Judicial review is not, as politicians would have the public believe, a tool by which judges overrule a political decision that they disagree with. The questions that the courts decide are those are of lawfulness, applying common law principles developed over centuries.

Politicians being frustrated by the courts is the sign of a healthy constitution. You would not know it from the government’s narrative, but the overwhelming majority of applications for judicial review are resolved in the government’s favour; the charge of judges abusing trust in democracy is just a complaint that the courts are not conferring on Johnson a 100% win rate.

And the key point, often marginalised and forgotten, is this: we live in a parliamentary democracy. The courts are required to follow the law passed by parliament. If parliament believes that the courts have misunderstood the effect of the law, or misinterpreted it, parliament can - at any time it has not been arbitrarily and unlawfully prorogued - legislate to make its intentions clear.

But that’s not what this government wants. Led by a prime minister indulged by a lifetime of never being told no, and guided by a self-styled “disruptor” with no respect for truth or the rule of law, we have an executive which, perhaps uniquely, has no intention of deferring to the courts or to parliament, or being in any way bound by the law.

It is, in the scheme of things, trivial but nevertheless emblematic that when Cummings himself was challenged about breaking the law during lockdown, the government not only gaslighted the public about the facts, but enjoined Suella Braverman, the attorney general and superintendent of the Crown Prosecution Service responsible for prosecuting breaches of lockdown regulations, to abuse her office by offering a public opinion on Twitter vouchsafing the lawfulness of Cummings’ conduct.

This was around the time that Priti Patel, the home secretary, irritated at judges having the audacity to rule against her in immigration detention bail hearings, sent a letter attempting to influence a senior immigration judge, and then, when the story was leaked, permitted her civil servants to lie about it on social media.

Institutions are expected to bend to the whim of the prime minister and his supplicants. The new commission is no different, which is why in Edward Faulks, the PM has appointed a chair who has not only written extensively about his own settled views on “the courts’ incursion into political territory”, but was a justice minister under Chris Grayling from 2013 to 2015 at a time when they were telling the Daily Mail that judicial review was a “promotional tool for left-wing campaigners” and legislating to restrict its use. Little surprise that he has also called for the repeal of the Human Rights Act, another awkward constraint on ministerial caprice.

Judges are tough critters, robust enough to deal with the rough-and-tumble of strong media criticism and the occasional politician stepping out of bounds. The reaction of Sir Terence Etherton to the “Enemies of the People” story is a case in point. JK Rowling tweeted:

“If the worst they can say about you is you’re an OPENLY GAY EX-OLYMPIC FENCER TOP JUDGE, you’ve basically won life.” Sir Terence and his husband had the tweet put on a mug.

However, judges are also human. And the cumulative effect of years of chipping away at the foundations is starting to show. In the immediate aftermath of the headline, the lord chief justice sought advice from the police for his protection – the first time in his career that he had needed to do so. More than half of all judges surveyed reported that they had feared for their personal safety.

Threats of hostage-taking, assault and death have become common. Some have been physically assaulted in court.

Not all of this can be attributed to media and political comment; judges are dealing with the most combustible elements of society and making decisions that can overturn people’s lives.

There is a heightened risk inherent in the job. But it would be the height of naivety to pretend that printed and tweeted words do not have consequences.

And it is not merely a British phenomenon. In the US not only has the supreme court divided along party lines since 2010, but President Trump makes unrestrained attacks on “so-called” judges and “Obama judges” who rule against his unlawful executive conduct.

While British people may laugh at the pantomime of Trump tweeting “See you in court!” at judges, here home secretaries are indulged in their threats to “fight” judges for their liberal treatment of “foreign criminals”. Trump’s rhetoric is ours.

If we lose judicial independence, we lose the rule of law. The day a judge makes a binding decision affecting the rights and liberties of one of us, not on the legal and factual merits, but with a nervous glance to the press and public galleries, or with a beady eye on political favour or punishment, is the day that the decay in our democracy turns terminal.

Judicial review is what protects us, the individual, from the overbearing might of the state. It exists to ensure that, however venal, corrupt or malign the politicians who govern us, we are treated equally and according to the law.

The government’s claims to be restoring trust in democracy by rolling back these checks and balances mask an audacious power grab, allowing them to govern unlawfully and without accountability.

Casting a glance across the world, we see the logical consequences taken to their grisly extremes. Every would-be authoritarian regime has the judiciary in its sights.

From the Polish Law and Justice party attempting to remove a third of its senior judges, to Turkish president Recep Tayyip Erdoğan dismissing a quarter of all judges following the failed military coup in 2016, to Hungary’s Viktor Orbán’s “climate of fear” leading to the removal of unfavoured judges and the installation of party loyalists.
Newsletter

Related Articles

London Daily
0:00
0:00
Close
Unelected PM of the UK holds an emergency meeting because a candidate got voted in… which he says is a threat to democracy…
You Are So Beautiful
Rob Schneider explains California reparations legislation.
Postmodern Jukebox European Tour Version
Who knew badminton could get so intense?
An old French tune (by Georges Brassens) Pomplamoose ft. John Schroeder
Farmers break through police barriers in Brussels.
Sattahip Motor Show 20
London's Iconic British Telecom Tower Sold To Become Hotel
SONATE AU CLAIR DE LUNE - Moonlight sonata
Ukraine Arrests Father-Son Duo In Lockbit Cybercrime Bust
A kiss to build a dream on
US Offers $15 Million For Info On Leaders Of Cybercrime Group Lockbit
Wonderful Tonight - Eric Clapton (Boyce Avenue acoustic cover)
Russia Claims UK Cultural Agency Spied for Ukraine
Mean Blues
Apple warns against drying iPhones with rice
La Chansonnette
Alexei Navalny: UK sanctions Russian prison chiefs after activist's death
Pattaya Addicts
German economy is in 'troubled waters' - ministry
Franz Liszt - Liebestraum - Love Dream
In a recent High Court hearing, the U.S. argued that Julian Assange endangered lives by releasing classified information.
Dream a little dream of me
New video
Unchained Melody sung like you've NEVER heard!
Tucker Carlson says Boris Johnson wants "a million dollars, in Bitcoin or cash, from Tucker Carlson to talk about Ukraine.
Dave Brubeck - Take Five
Russia is rebuilding capacity to destabilize European countries, new UK report warns
Édith Piaf - Non, Je Ne Regrette Rien (Sofie)
EU Commission wants anti-drone defenses at Brussels HQ
Rondo Alla Turca
Von der Leyen’s 2nd-term pitch: More military might, less climate talk
Kiss of fire
Global Law Enforcement Dismantles Lockbit Ransomware Operation
Tom Jones - I´ll Never Fall In Love Again 1967, 1989, 2001
Prince William Urges End to Gaza Conflict
Israel Cachao López - Guajira Clásica
UK court to hear Assange's final appeal against extradition to the US, where he faces charges related to his journalistic work—the publication of a classified video in 2010 that exposed US war crimes against humanity.
Edward Maya - Stereo Love (feat. Vika Jigulina) (Extended Mix)
About 50-60% kids either chose to be YouTuber or influencer
Strauss - Radetzky March - Karajan
A viral video of Nationals MP Barnaby Joyce lying on a Canberra footpath is celebrated by his media mates.
La vie en rose
European Countries React to Navalny's Death by Summoning Russian Diplomats
The Temptations - My Girl (Smokey Robinson Tribute) 2006 Kennedy Cent
Israel has gone ‘beyond self-defence’ in Gaza, says Labour’s Streeting
Orlando Cachaito Lopez Redencion
English farmers to be offered ‘largest ever’ grant scheme amid food security concerns
Edith Piaf - NON, JE NE REGRETTE RIEN
Cameron government knew Post Office ditched Horizon IT investigation
RADETZKY MARCH-2008-Wien, New Year Concert
EU Calls for Immediate Ceasefire in Gaza Conflict
Only you (And you alone)
EU Vows To Hold Putin "Accountable" After Meeting Alexei Navalny's Wife
Strangers In The Night
EU Launches Probe Into TikTok Over Child Protection Under Digital Content Law
Charles Aznavour - La Boheme
The EU Initiates Naval Mission to Defend Red Sea Trade Routes
Summer time
EU and UK Announce Joint Effort on Migration
Sting and Stevie Wonder - Fragile (from Sting's 60th birthday concert)
Brazil's Lula Likens Gaza Operation to Holocaust, Israel Says "Red Line" Crossed
Aux Champs Elysees
Ministers Confirm Proposal to Prohibit Mobile Phone Usage in English Schools
Stand By Me - Ben E. King (Boyce Avenue acoustic cover)
Microsoft-backed OpenAI valued at $80bn after company completes deal
La Mer (Beyond the Sea) – Avalon Jazz Band
‘Alexei would want to tell Russia not to give up fighting’
She
Rwandan Footballer's Dismissal Sparks Concerns Over UK Asylum Plan
Nathalie Song by Enzo Petrachi Stjepan Hauser Cello
Whisky Challenges China's Baijiu Market During New Year Celebrations
Shape of My Heart - Sting (Boyce Avenue acoustic cover)
Avdiivka - Symbol Of Ukrainian Resistance Now In Control Of Russian Troops
Radiohead - Creep
Putin Critic Alexei Navalny's "Killers" Refusing To Hand Over Body, Say Allies
Quizás,Quizás,Quizás - Andrea Bocelli - Jennifer Lopez
"Historic Step": Zelensky Signs Security Pact With Germany
Perhaps, Perhaps, Perhaps - Multi-Couples
"Historic Step": Zelensky Signs Security Pact With Germany
Pentatonix Havana
20 Tech Giants Sign Effort To Fight AI Election Interference Across Globe
Paula Cole - Autumn Leaves
Joe Biden Accuses Putin of Causing Navalny's Death
Oscar Benton Bensonhurst Blues
Russian opposition leader Alexey Navalny has died at the Arctic prison colony
OH NANANA vs ABUSADAMENTE
Tucker Carlson grocery shopping in Russia. This is so interesting.
Nina Simone - ”I Put A Spell On You”. Vezi aici cum cântă Jeremy Ragsd
Julian Assange's Wife Warns of His Death if Extradited to US
NIGHTWISH - The Phantom Of The Opera
‘A lot higher than we expected’: Russian arms production worries Europe’s war planners
Motorshow 2016 Tanjay Negros Oriental
Greece Legalizes Same-Sex Marriage and Adoption Rights
Monica Bellucci - Ti Amo
Hungarian Foreign Minister: Europeans will lose Europe, the Union's policy must change drastically
Michael Jackson - Billie Jean Milena The Voice France 2018
In Britain Homeowners are receiving CPO’s (Compulsory Purchase Orders) so their homes can be redistributed to migrants
Michael Buble (Help Me Make It Through The Night) feat Loren Allred
Memories Canon In D - Maroon 5 (Boyce Avenue piano acoustic cover)
Matteo Simoni - Marina
Maroon 5 - One More Night
Maroon 5 - Memories
Mark Knopfler - Brothers In Arms (Berlin 2007 Live)
Mark Knopfler & Emmylou Harris - Romeo And Juliet (Real Live Roadrunni
Marina, Marina - The LUCKY DUCKIES intimist live concert at Guimarães
Major Lazer & DJ Snake – Lean On Mauranne The Voice France 2016
Love Theme from Romeo and Juliet - Joslin - Henri Mancini, Nino Rota
LoLa & Hauser - Love Story
Linkin Park Jay-Z - Numb Encore (Live 8 2005)
Hallelujah Mennel Ibtissem, The Voice France Leonard Cohen
Leonard Cohen - Dance Me to the End of Love
Leonard Cohen & Natasha Rostova - Dance me to the end of love
La casa de papel - Bella Ciao
La Camisa Negra
L'italiano (Toto Cutugno) - The Gypsy Queens
Juanes - La Camisa Negra
Jonathan and Charlotte - Britain's Got Talent 2012 Live Semi Final - U
John Powell - Assassin's Tango
Joe Cocker - You Can Leave Your Hat On (LIVE in Dortmund)
Joe Cocker - Unchain My Heart 2002 Live
Joe Cocker - A Whiter Shade Of Pale
Jay Z & Alicia Keys - Empire State of Mind LIVE
Jason Mraz - Im Yours (live)
Jarrod Radnich - Bohemian Rhapsody - Virtuosic Piano Solo
James Blunt - You're Beautiful
James Blunt - You're Beautiful & Bonfire Heart (Live at The Nobel Peac)
If You Go Away - Helen Merrill & Stan Getz (Tribute to Virna Lisi)
I'LL BE MISSING YOU
I Say a Little Prayer
Hotel California ( Eagles ) 1994 Live
Historia de un amor - Luz Casal. Vezi interpretarea Biancăi Sumanariu
Here Comes The Sun - The Beatles (Boyce Avenue acoustic cover) on Spot
Heart - Stairway to Heaven Led Zeppelin - Kennedy Center Honors
HAVANA by Camila Cabello Zumba Pre Cooldown TML Crew Kramer Pastra
HAUSER and Señorita - I Will Always Love You
HAUSER - Waka Waka
HAUSER - Sway
HAUSER - Lambada
HAUSER - Historia de un Amor
HAUSER - Despacito
Great Pretender
Georgia May Foote & Giovanni Pernice Samba to 'Volare' - Strictly Come
Gary Moore - Still Got The Blues
GIPSY KINGS VOLARE Penelope Cruz
Fugees - Killing Me Softly With His Song
French Latino - Historia de un Amor
For A Few Dollars More The Danish National Symphony Orchestra (Live)
Flashdance • What a Feeling • Irene Cara
Filip Rudan - “Someone You Loved” Audicija 4 The Voice Hrvatska Sez
Eric Clapton - Wonderful Tonight
Enya - Only Time
Enrique Iglesias - Bailando (English Version) ft. Sean Paul
Enrique Iglesias - Bailamos
Elena Yerevan Historia de un amor
Ed Sheeran - Shape of You (Official Music Video)
Ed Sheeran - Perfect Symphony [with Andrea Bocelli]
Ed Sheeran - Perfect (Official Music Video)
Easy On Me - Adele (Boyce Avenue 90’s style piano acoustic cover) on S
ERA - Ameno
ELENA YEREVAN- Cancion Del Mariachi-IN STUDIO-2017 DPR
Dust In The Wind - Kansas (Boyce Avenue acoustic cover)
Don't Let Me Be Misunderstood
Despacito x Shape Of You - Pentatonix
Deep Purple - Child In Time - Live (1970)
David Foster When A Man Loves A WomanIt's A Mans World (SealMichael Bo
Dance me to the end of Love ( Pi-Air Design )
Coolio - Gangsta's Paradise (feat. L.V.) [Official Music Video]
Conquest Of Paradise (Vangelis), played on Böhm Emporio organ
Cielito Lindo
Chico & The Gypsies - Bamboleo
Canción Del Mariachi - Antonio Banderas, Los Lobos • Desperado
Camila Cabello - Havana (Audio) ft. Young Thug
Camila Cabello - Havana ( cover by J.Fla )
California Dreamin' - The Mamas & The Papas José Feliciano (Boyce Ave
Buster Benton - Money Is The Name of The Game
Hallelujah Pentatonix
Bobby McFerrin - Don't Worry Be Happy (Official Music Video)
Bob Dylan - Knockin' On Heaven's Door Emilia The Voice Kids France
Besame Mucho - Cesaria Evora
Ben E. King - Stand by Me Sax Cover Alexandra Ilieva Thomann
Bella Ciao
Bella Ciao - INSTRUMENTAL
Beautiful in White x Canon in D (Piano Cover by Riyandi Kusuma)
Bad Romance - Vintage 1920's Gatsby Style Lady Gaga Cover ft. Ariana Savalas & Sarah Reich(1)
BELLA CIAO 2020 - KARAOKE ITALIANO
BAMBOLEO - Gipsy Kings • Antonio Banderas, Katya Virshilas
BAILANDO (original)
Awesome Ukrainian yodeler - SOFIA SHKIDCHENKO (with English subtitles)
Avicii - The Nights
Atom - The Great Gig in the Sky
Aretha Franklin - (You Make Me Feel Like) A Natural Woman (Official Ly
Antonio Banderas - Cancion del Mariachi (Desperado)
André Rieu - Zorba's Dance (Sirtaki)
André Rieu - Can't Help Falling In Love
André Rieu & Mirusia - Ave Maria
Andrew Reyes Elton John - Don't Let The Sun Go Down The Voice 2020 (
Andreas Kümmert Whiter Shade Of Pale The Voice of Germany 2013 Showd
And I Love You So
All About That Bass - Postmodern Jukebox European Tour Version
Alan Walker - Faded (Piano Cover)
Ain't No Sunshine -- Bill Withers (cover by Canen 12 y.o.)
African music
Adriana Vidović - “Creep” Audicija 4 The Voice Hrvatska Sezona 3
Adriana Vidović - “Believer” Nokaut 3 The Voice Hrvatska Sezona 3
A Fistful of Dollars - The Danish National Symphony Orchestra and Tuva
4 Beautiful Soundtracks Relaxing Piano [10min]
2CELLOS - Whole Lotta Love vs. Beethoven 5th Symphony [OFFICIAL VIDEO]
2CELLOS - Smooth Criminal (Live at Suntory Hall, Tokyo)
2CELLOS - Smells Like Teen Spirit [Live at Sydney Opera House]
2CELLOS - Despacito [OFFICIAL VIDEO]
13 Year Old Girl Playing Il Silenzio (The Silence) - André Rieu
094.All About That Bass
00 - SADNESS PART 1
(Ghost) Riders In the Sky (American Outlaws Live at Nassau Coliseum, 1
(Everything I Do) I Do It For You - Bryan Adams (Boyce Avenue ft. Conn
What a wonderful world
Moon river
×