London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Wednesday, Jul 29, 2026

Revealed: scandal of NHS charges putting pregnant migrant women at risk

Revealed: scandal of NHS charges putting pregnant migrant women at risk

Vulnerable women face huge bills before giving birth, campaigners say

The health of pregnant migrant women and their unborn babies is being put at risk due to fears around NHS charging, with some trusts demanding upfront fees for maternity care or wrongly charging those who are exempt, it has been claimed.

Vulnerable migrant and asylum-seeking women with no recourse to public funds are frequently being issued huge bills ahead of giving birth or aggressively pursued for payments during their pregnancy against current guidance, maternity rights groups have warned.

According to Maternity Action, which supports around 400 women a year who have had encountered difficulties with NHS charges, one trust asked a migrant woman for a £5,000 deposit for her birth. Another demanded monthly repayments of £800 from a woman who could not afford to pay and referred her to a debt collection agency while she was still pregnant.

“There should be no upfront charging for maternity care. Every woman is entitled to antenatal care regardless of whether or not they are chargeable,” said Christine Benson, an immigration lawyer for Maternity Action.

“What we saw previously was trusts giving invoices to pregnant women but not requiring payment until after the birth. However, increasingly over the last eight months we are seeing NHS trusts having different approaches to undocumented women in relation to charging.” NHS trusts, she added, had misassessed regulations “many, many times”.

The culture of fear around charging means women are sometimes declining vital care.

Ros Bragg, director of Maternity Action, said: “Many women are frightened to attend their appointments after receiving these invoices. Those who are chargeable include some of the most vulnerable women in the UK who do not have permission to work or access to the mainstream benefits system. They may be living in exploitative relationships in order to secure food or accommodation.

“The policies deter women from accessing maternity care but, more worryingly, the safeguards within these policies are not routinely being followed by NHS trusts, particularly in England. As a result, a woman who, for example, discloses domestic violence or abuse may still be charged or may not be referred on to other agencies.”

One woman, known as Sandra, who came to the UK from Ghana, said before giving birth at a north London hospital she was told she would need to find £2,000 for a natural birth or £4,000 for a C-section.

She told the Observer: “The midwives were doing their job and would still see me but the NHS kept calling me and asking for money. I managed to pay £300 initially then weekly payments of £20, but it was all I could afford.”

After her baby was delivered by emergency C-section she received constant phone calls from the trust threatening to report her to the Home Office. “My partner left me, so it was just me and my baby. Every time they called I said: ‘I can’t pay you because I need the money to feed my child.’”

The impact of NHS charging was a common theme raised by women giving evidence to the organisation Birthrights as part of an ongoing inquiry into racial disparities in maternity care.

During six focus groups with refugee, asylum-seeking and migrant women from a range of ethnic communities across in London and Swansea, multiple participants claimed their antenatal care was negatively impacted by a fear linked to their immigration status.

One woman who experienced bleeding in early pregnancy was denied a scan unless she could pay £220 upfront. Another said the Home Office unexpectedly turned up at her home on the day she had a scheduled induction to move her and her husband out of London. Others received NHS letters demanding payments of more than £5,000 when they went into labour – and in some cases British-born women were assumed to be chargeable due to the colour of their skin, the inquiry heard.

Amy Gibbs, chief executive of Birthrights, said: “Our inquiry heard multiple accounts of black and brown women being too afraid to access antenatal or hospital care, facing intrusive questions about their immigration status during appointments and receiving demands to pay thousands of pounds for routine care when they can’t afford basic essentials. Failure to provide adequate interpreting services compounds these barriers. This is structural racism in action.” Evidence shows that women from Black and Asian backgrounds – which includes many migrants – are more likely to die and have poorer outcomes in childbirth than white women.

The Royal College of Midwives has called on the government to scrap the “punitive” NHS charging of pregnant migrant women and last week issued fresh guidance on the matter. Clare Livingstone, an RCM policy adviser, said: “No women should be afraid to come forward to get the care they are entitled to, and we must remove any obstacles that prevent them doing that. This means not charging them for their care.”

Currently migrant women should not be relocated from 34 weeks pregnancy but the RCM is calling for this to be changed to 20 weeks.

A government spokesperson said: “All refugees, asylum seekers and victims of modern slavery are exempt from NHS treatment costs. While some other migrants or visitors to the UK may be required to contribute, we’ve always been clear urgent care should never be delayed or withheld over charges, including all maternity services. It is illegal for any relevant body to racially profile patients and our guidance makes very clear that every patient should go through the same process when identifying who may have to pay for their healthcare.”

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
NHS Leaders Warn Royal Mail Tariff Increases Will Raise Administrative Costs
Immigration Remains the Public's Top Concern in Britain, Ipsos Poll Finds
Britain Approves 16 New Grid Storage Projects to Strengthen Electricity Network
London-Listed Merger Activity Climbs Even as IPO Market Remains Weak
Institute of Directors Warns High Energy Costs and Taxes Continue to Weigh on UK Businesses
North Sea Industry Calls for Faster Approval of £10 Billion Rosebank and Jackdaw Projects
UK Inflation Eases to 2.6% but Higher Energy Costs Could Renew Price Pressures
Burnham Holds Talks With Saudi and Qatari Leaders on Middle East Security and Energy
Burnham and Zelenskyy Announce UK Electronic Warfare Technology Cooperation During London Visit
Prime Minister Andy Burnham Launches Cross-Party Push for Social Care Reform in England
Trump says Israel ‘would not survive’ without US
France Evacuates Atlantic Coast Resorts as Wildfire Risk Rises Again
Magnitude 7.1 Earthquake Strikes Kumamoto as Rescuers Search Collapsed Buildings
OpenAI Faces Demands for Full Disclosure After Models Breach Hugging Face
Nvidia Reportedly Takes Vast Texas Data-Centre Lease to Underwrite AI Expansion
Royal Collection Trust Income Falls as Palace Visits Retreat From Record Highs
FIFA’s Private-Investment Plan for World Cup Rights Draws European Revolt
Ministers Examine Social-Care Levy as Burnham Seeks Funding Settlement
UK Attractions Sector Forecast to Add £587 Million in Visitor Spending
England Coast Path Extends With New Suffolk Estuary Walking Route
Attorney General Wins Longer Jail Term for Fatal Dangerous Driving Case
Andrew and Tristan Tate Remain in U.S. Custody Pending UK Extradition
Royal Fleet Auxiliary Workers Secure Above-Inflation Pay Deal
Prime Minister Seeks Cross-Party Agreement on Social Care Reform
Court Upholds Competition Ruling Against Drugmakers Over Hydrocortisone Prices
UK Unveils Major Technical Education Reform for Secondary Schools
UK Judge Rebukes Home Office Over AI-Generated Errors in Asylum Case
UK and Ukraine Agree to Share Electronic Warfare Technology
Apple Briefly Crosses Five Trillion Dollar Valuation as Investors Retreat From AI Bets
Badenoch Offers Tory Votes to Keep Serious Offenders in Prison
Why Americans Queue for $15 Ice Cream and a $100 Caviar Pint
Another AI Genius Left the United States — and Silicon Valley Is Starting to Worry
Shein Reports $99mn Loss as Trade Barriers Test Low-Cost Model
CXMT Gains 466% in China’s Biggest IPO Since 2010
Amazon Seeks Approval for 5,105-Satellite Mobile Network
Burnham Puts School-to-Work Reform at Centre of Welfare Strategy
Johnson & Johnson Agrees to $5.5 Billion Talc Lawsuit Settlement
EU AI Act Shapes Global Corporate Standards, Study Finds
UK-Japan Relations Expected to Deepen Under Burnham Government
Burnham Signals Tough Decisions on Council Tax Reform
UK Inflation Slows to 2.6% in June
Bank of England Holds Interest Rates at 3.75%
Prime Minister Burnham Opens Talks With Business Leaders on Economic Growth
Government Launches 'Number Ten North' to Drive UK Devolution
Labour Regains Poll Lead After Burnham's First Weeks in Office
Prime Minister Burnham Rules Out Early UK General Election Before 2029
Burnham Rules Out Replacing Council Tax and Stamp Duty
Fresh Heatwave Threatens to Rekindle France’s Historic Wildfire Crisis
The Burnham government is seeking to establish its credibility through ambitious social care reform while maintaining fiscal discipline and public confidence in the National Health Service. Labour's early improvement in opinion polls provides political momentum, but sustained support will depend on delivering tangible policy outcomes. Britain continues to reinforce its role in European security through long-term support for Ukraine, while climate-related risks, including increasingly severe wildfires across England and Scotland, are becoming a more prominent national resilience challenge alongside economic uncertainty.
United Kingdom Economy Remains Exposed to Global Energy Risks
×