Peter Mandelson, the former British ambassador to the United States, has issued an apology to the victims of the late convicted sex offender Jeffrey Epstein while stopping short of apologising for his own past association with the disgraced financier.

In his first major broadcast interview since being dismissed from his diplomatic post in September, Mandelson framed his remorse around systemic failures that left victims without protection, emphasising that his apology was directed at those harmed rather than at his personal conduct.

This nuanced position has shaped renewed debate about accountability and institutional response in the wake of high-profile scandals.

Mandelson reiterated that he was unaware of Epstein’s abuse and vehemently denied being complicit or knowledgeable about the criminal behaviour, asserting that if he had known of the actions he would have acted differently.

He described Epstein as an "evil monster" and expressed regret for having believed explanations offered by the financier and his legal team, including views on the earlier conviction Epstein faced in two thousand eight for soliciting a minor.

Mandelson also suggested that his own social position meant he was not exposed to the worst of Epstein’s conduct, a claim that has drawn significant public attention.

The former ambassador’s remarks come against a backdrop of controversy that led to his removal by Prime Minister Sir Keir Starmer after emails surfaced showing a closer relationship with Epstein than previously acknowledged, including messages of support after Epstein’s conviction.

Government officials had said that the depth of Mandelson’s ties appeared materially different from what was understood when he was appointed, prompting his dismissal.

Since then, Christian Turner has been appointed as the United Kingdom’s ambassador to Washington.

Mandelson acknowledged his dismissal and said he understands the decision, insisting he will not seek to reopen the matter.

Reactions to Mandelson’s interview have been mixed.

Some observers welcomed his apology to victims and recognition of institutional failings, while others criticised him for not taking direct responsibility for his own association with Epstein.

The episode has sparked discussion in Britain over the vetting of senior officials and the responsibilities of public figures whose personal relationships intersect with serious criminal cases, with many calling for clearer standards and greater accountability in future appointments.