London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Friday, Aug 22, 2025

Changes to gender recognition laws ruled out

Changes to gender recognition laws ruled out

Ministers have ruled out changes to make it easier for transgender people in England and Wales to have their gender legally recognised.

They have rejected calls for people to be able to self-identify their gender and change their birth certificates without a medical diagnosis.

Ministers said reform of the 2004 Gender Recognition Act was not the "top priority" for trans people.

The UK's equalities watchdog said it was a "missed opportunity".

But women's rights groups applauded the decision as a "victory for fairness and common sense".

Ministers are pledging action to make it easier for trans people to obtain a Gender Recognition Certificate and to improve healthcare services for them.

But LGBT groups had urged them to go much further, by making it easier for people to legally transition from their birth sex and to provide greater protection under the law.

Currently, the Gender Recognition Act requires trans people to go through a long process in order to change their birth certificates.

A "self-ID" process, allowing changes to birth certificates without a medical diagnosis, was one of the ideas put forward in a consultation undertaken by the last Conservative government, led by Theresa May.

Of the 102,818 responses received, 64% said there should not be a requirement for a diagnosis of gender dysphoria in the future, on the grounds that being trans was neither a medical nor a mental health issue.

But, in a statement, Equalities Minister Liz Truss said she believed the law as it stood provided the right "checks and balances".

"We want transgender people to be free to live and to prosper in a modern Britain," she said.

"It is the government's view that the balance struck in this legislation is correct, in that there are proper checks and balances in the system and also support for people who want to change their legal sex.

"We have also come to understand that gender recognition reform, though supported in the consultation undertaken by the last government, is not the top priority for transgender people."

Analysis: Jessica Parker, BBC Political Correspondent


It's now nearly three years since Theresa May talked about "de-medicalising" the gender recognition process.

And it raised hopes, in some quarters, that fundamental reforms were on the way.

Elsewhere, it raised fears that women's rights were set to be eroded.

And as that debate raged, ministers seemed to retreat from the scene, unwilling or unsure about how to publicly deal with this political 'hot potato'.

And although an official response remained missing in action, it did increasingly become clear that Boris Johnson's administration was unlikely to back what's known as self-ID.

Now, finally, ministers have made up their mind.

It's a no to changing the law - albeit a yes to cutting the costs of the process.

And there are promises to try and address some very real concerns about healthcare.

While that move will be welcomed by many, such measures may also be perceived as a way of trying to sweeten the pill for those who are disappointed about the lack of legal reform.

What next?

After the drawn out delays in Whitehall - and divisive debates in some communities - it's very doubtful that this government will seek to delve into the self-ID debate again any time soon.

Ms Truss said the 2010 Equality Act, landmark legislation passed towards the end of the last Labour government, "clearly protects" transgender people from discrimination while allowing service providers to restrict access to single sex spaces on the basis of biological sex if there is a clear justification.

Kinder process


The government is pledging to cut the time involved in applying for a Gender Recognition Certificate, making the process "kinder and more straightforward", as well as reducing the £140 cost to a "nominal" amount.

And it is also promising to cut waiting times at NHS gender clinics.

The Equalities and Human Rights Commission welcomed the steps but said it regretted the fact that ministers had passed up an opportunity to "simplify the law".

"There is more to be done to increase understanding in wider society and address the divisive public dialogue in this space," a spokesman said.

Stonewall, which campaigns for equality for lesbian, bisexual, gay and trans people, said the "minimal administrative" changes being proposed were totally inadequate.


Trans rights campaigners outside Holyrood calling for reforms


"While these moves will make the current process less costly and bureaucratic, they don't go anywhere near far enough toward meaningfully reforming the Act to make it easier for all trans people to go about their daily life," said the organisation's chief executive Nancy Kelley.

'Fair balance'


And, in a joint statement, Amnesty International UK, Liberty and Human Rights Watch said it was a "missed opportunity" to ensure the law kept pace with "human rights standards".

"Research has found that medical barriers to gender recognition for trans people are unnecessarily intrusive and can harm their physical and mental health," the three organisations said.

"With medical requirements still in place, trans people will continue to be forced through harmful processes to have their gender legally recognised."

But Fair Play for Women, a group committed to defending the sex-based rights of women, said Ms Truss had made the right decision.

It said the government had "acknowledged women are stakeholders too and policies must fairly balance the conflicting rights of trans people and women".

"Trans people in the UK have some of the strongest legal protections in the world. That does not change today."

In Scotland, plans that would have allowed trans people to self-identify have been put on hold following criticism from across the political spectrum, including from within the SNP.

A draft bill published by the Scottish government in December would have removed the requirement for people to provide medical evidence of their diagnosis of gender dysphoria.

No change is now expected before next year's Holyrood elections although Scottish minsters say they remain "committed" to updating the law so people can get a gender recognition certificate without "unnecessary stress".

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Bunkers, Billions and Apocalypse: The Secret Compounds of Zuckerberg and the Tech Giants
Ukraine Declares De Facto War on Hungary and Slovakia with Terror Drone Strikes on Their Gas Lifeline
Animated K-pop Musical ‘KPop Demon Hunters’ Becomes Netflix’s Most-Watched Original Animated Film
New York Appeals Court Voids Nearly $500 Million Civil Fraud Penalty Against Trump While Upholding Fraud Liability
Elon Musk tweeted, “Europe is dying”
Far-Right Activist Convicted of Incitement Changes Gender and Demands: "Send Me to a Women’s Prison" | The Storm in Germany
Hungary Criticizes Ukraine: "Violating Our Sovereignty"
Will this be the first country to return to negative interest rates?
Child-free hotels spark controversy
North Korea is where this 95-year-old wants to die. South Korea won’t let him go. Is this our ally or a human rights enemy?
Hong Kong Launches Regulatory Regime and Trials for HKD-Backed Stablecoins
China rehearses September 3 Victory Day parade as imagery points to ‘loyal wingman’ FH-97 family presence
Trump Called Viktor Orbán: "Why Are You Using the Veto"
Horror in the Skies: Plane Engine Exploded, Passengers Sent Farewell Messages
MSNBC Rebrands as MS NOW Amid Comcast’s Cable Spin-Off
AI in Policing: Draft One Helps Speed Up Reports but Raises Legal and Ethical Concerns
Shame in Norway: Crown Princess’s Son Accused of Four Rapes
Apple Begins Simultaneous iPhone 17 Production in India and China
A Robot to Give Birth: The Chinese Announcement That Shakes the World
Finnish MP Dies by Suicide in Parliament Building
Outrage in the Tennis World After Jannik Sinner’s Withdrawal Storm
William and Kate Are Moving House – and the New Neighbors Were Evicted
Class Action Lawsuit Against Volkswagen: Steering Wheel Switches Cause Accidents
Taylor Swift on the Way to the Super Bowl? All the Clues Stirring Up Fans
Dogfights in the Skies: Airbus on Track to Overtake Boeing and Claim Aviation Supremacy
Tim Cook Promises an AI Revolution at Apple: "One of the Most Significant Technologies of Our Generation"
Apple Expands Social Media Presence in China With RedNote Account Ahead of iPhone 17 Launch
Are AI Data Centres the Infrastructure of the Future or the Next Crisis?
Cambridge Dictionary Adds 'Skibidi,' 'Delulu,' and 'Tradwife' Amid Surge of Online Slang
Bill Barr Testifies No Evidence Implicated Trump in Epstein Case; DOJ Set to Release Records
Zelenskyy Returns to White House Flanked by European Allies as Trump Pressures Land-Swap Deal with Putin
The CEO Who Replaced 80% of Employees for the AI Revolution: "I Would Do It Again"
Emails Worth Billions: How Airlines Generate Huge Profits
Character.ai Bets on Future of AI Companionship
China Ramps Up Tax Crackdown on Overseas Investments
Japanese Office Furniture Maker Expands into Bomb Shelter Market
Intel Shares Surge on Possible U.S. Government Investment
Hurricane Erin Threatens U.S. East Coast with Dangerous Surf
EU Blocks Trade Statement Over Digital Rule Dispute
EU Sends Record Aid as Spain Battles Wildfires
JPMorgan Plans New Canary Wharf Tower
Zelenskyy and his allies say they will press Trump on security guarantees
Beijing is moving into gold and other assets, diversifying away from the dollar
Escalating Clashes in Serbia as Anti-Government Protests Spread Nationwide
The Drought in Britain and the Strange Request from the Government to Delete Old Emails
Category 5 Hurricane in the Caribbean: 'Catastrophic Storm' with Winds of 255 km/h
"No, Thanks": The Mathematical Genius Who Turned Down 1.5 Billion Dollars from Zuckerberg
The surprising hero, the ugly incident, and the criticism despite victory: "Liverpool’s defense exposed in full"
Digital Humans Move Beyond Sci-Fi: From Virtual DJs to AI Customer Agents
YouTube will start using AI to guess your age. If it’s wrong, you’ll have to prove it
×