London Daily
Focus on the big picture.

LONDON DAILY ARCHIVE

Transport Secretary Faces Calls to Name Train After Margaret Thatcher

In a Commons session, MPs discuss nationalization of rail services and fare reform amidst the Conservative Party's proposals.

15 February 2025 · 06:00 UTC

During Transport Questions in the House of Commons on Thursday, Sir Edward Leigh, Conservative MP for Gainsborough, urged Transport Secretary Heidi Alexander to reconsider the reintroduction of the London North Eastern Railway (LNER) service between Cleethorpes and London, with stops in Grimsby, Lincoln, and Market Rasen.

He requested that a locomotive on this route be named after former Prime Minister Margaret Thatcher, citing it as a reminder of reducing rail service costs by addressing restrictive trade union practices.

In response, Ms. Alexander indicated that she could not commit to the suggestion of naming a train after Thatcher.

The discussion came on the heels of the royal assent granted to the UK Government’s Passenger Railway Services (Public Ownership) Act 2024 in November 2022, which aims to nationalize train operations across the country.

Ms. Alexander reiterated the government's commitment to public ownership aimed at creating a more affordable railway system.

She noted that the 4.6% fare increase this year was the lowest in three years and highlighted ongoing efforts to reform the complex fare system and innovate ticketing options, particularly in urban areas.

The session also saw Conservative MP Andrew Rosindell of Romford emphasizing the high rail fares faced by British commuters, stating that the government has prioritized a socialist agenda while neglecting the financial burdens on everyday travelers.

He urged the Secretary of State to focus on reducing fares and improving services.

In her reply, Ms. Alexander addressed Mr. Rosindell’s concerns by referencing historical fare increases during his government’s tenure, which she claimed outpaced wage growth.

Additionally, she pointed to nearly a billion pounds that train operating companies have paid to their parent firms since 2020, which had been approved by Conservative ministers in the previous administration, suggesting that the focus should be on evaluating value for money in railway operations.