London Daily
Focus on the big picture.

LONDON DAILY ARCHIVE

Proposed Changes to GCSE and Curriculum Assessments in Labour's Education Review

Labour's interim curriculum review suggests fewer GCSE exams while maintaining primary assessments, focusing on inclusivity and applied skills.

19 March 2025 · 06:50 UTC

A recent interim report released by an expert panel reviewing the national curriculum and assessment in England, commissioned by Labour's education secretary Bridget Phillipson, suggests significant changes to the current system of GCSE examinations.

Among these recommendations is a proposal to reduce the overall number of GCSE exams taken by students, which currently ranges between 24 and 31 at the conclusion of secondary school, aligning this practice more closely with high-performing countries.

The report also indicates that the English baccalaureate (Ebacc), a suite of academic subjects introduced in 2010, may be scrapped due to concerns it limits student choice in vocational and arts subjects.

Despite discussions surrounding examinations, primary school assessments, commonly known as Sats, are set to remain in place, as stated in the findings, despite considerable pushback from parents and educational instructors.

The ongoing review reflects an intention to incorporate greater diversity and inclusiveness within the curriculum, ensuring that children can see themselves represented in educational materials.

Additionally, the panel advocates for an enhanced focus on digital and media literacy, sustainability, and climate science.

The recommendations are aimed at equipping students with the necessary skills to address contemporary challenges.

Plans for integrating applied knowledge and skills into the curriculum are also being considered, which would include areas such as finance, budgeting, and public speaking, responding to persistent calls from parents and students for relevant, practical education.

The review highlights concerns about the current academic framework, indicating that while high standards persist, it is not equally effective for all students, particularly those from disadvantaged backgrounds or with special educational needs.

Professor Becky Francis, leading the review, noted that there are issues of equity in the current education system that need addressing.

Shadow education secretary Laura Trott expressed concern over the potential reduction of qualifications, suggesting it could indicate a return to lowering expectations.

Conversely, the report acknowledges that while the Ebacc was intended to ensure access to a comprehensive academic curriculum, its effectiveness in achieving these objectives is under scrutiny as the review progresses.

The National Association of Head Teachers (NAHT) voiced support for acknowledging the detrimental impacts of the Ebacc, excessive GCSE assessments, and the challenges posed by the current resit policies.

However, the organization expressed disappointment regarding the decision to maintain Sats assessments in primary education.

A final report with comprehensive recommendations is expected to be submitted to government ministers in the autumn following a call for evidence that received 7,000 responses.