London Daily
Focus on the big picture.

LONDON DAILY ARCHIVE

Peers Vote Against Approving Rwanda Treaty for Asylum Scheme

Peers in the House of Lords have voted to postpone the UK-Rwanda asylum treaty, citing the need for Rwanda to enhance its asylum processes.

23 January 2024 · 04:41 UTC

The motion, which passed with 214 to 171 votes, urges the government not to finalize the treaty, though it does not formally bind the government to take action.

Signed in December, this treaty is key to Prime Minister Rishi Sunak's plan to transfer asylum seekers to Rwanda and is distinct from the Rwanda Safety Bill.

Despite no immediate response from Downing Street, the non-binding vote signals the resistance Mr. Sunak may encounter as the Lords prepare to discuss the bill, designed to limit legal objections to the deportations.

In the vote, only one Conservative peer dissented. This was the first vote under the 2010 Constitutional Reform and Governance Act's new rules for the Lords to challenge treaty ratification. While Parliament's support isn't required to ratify the treaty, it will become official with the passage of the Rwanda Bill.

The UK-Rwanda Treaty aims to deter illegal Channel crossings by relocating migrants to Rwanda, crafted following a Supreme Court verdict deeming the initial Rwanda policy illegal.

Home Secretary James Cleverly asserts the new treaty will protect relocated individuals from being sent to hazardous locations—known as non-refoulement—and will introduce a specialized appeal body for asylum cases.

The treaty is slated for oversight by an independent committee with enhanced enforcement powers, including a complaints system for relocated individuals and their lawyers.

However, the Lords motion, introduced by former Labour Attorney General Lord Goldsmith, recommends withholding treaty approval until the Rwandan system's safety is verified.

Lord Goldsmith and other skeptics argue that Rwanda's promised protections are not yet operational, as outlined in a recent report from the cross-party International Agreements Committee. Liberal Democrat Lord Fox supports postponement until lawful conditions are established.