LONDON DAILY ARCHIVE
Ofgem Chief Urges Additional Powers to Recover Funds Post Energy Firm Collapses
Call for regulatory power enhancements follows shareholder profit from energy hedges amid firm bankruptcies.
23 January 2025 · 06:26 UTC

This appeal was made during his testimony to the Energy Security and Net Zero Committee of Members of Parliament.
Brearley highlighted that some shareholders benefited financially from energy price spikes after their companies had failed during the recent energy crisis.
He indicated that these occurrences expose a significant shortfall in Ofgem's current regulatory authority and advocated for increased powers to address such issues.
The backdrop of the situation involves the surge in energy prices in 2022, significantly impacted by geopolitical tensions following Russia's invasion of Ukraine.
This led to widespread financial strain for consumers and the collapse of over 30 energy firms within a year, resulting in millions of customers facing transitions to new, and sometimes costlier, suppliers.
Despite these collapses, shareholders of some insolvent companies profited through hedging—purchasing power at fixed prices before the collapse and capitalizing on the subsequent rise in energy value.
Brearley expressed frustration over the situation, describing instances where shareholders 'walked away with valuable energy hedges' that appreciated substantially during the crisis, generating profits amounting to 'hundreds of millions of pounds' across multiple firms.
Emphasizing the need for customer reimbursement as a priority, Brearley stated, 'Quite frankly, before anybody else gets paid anything, customers need to be paid back.' The Ofgem chief did not specify which companies were involved.
Jonathan Brearley, who was recently reappointed for another five-year term as Ofgem's leader, will navigate the regulator through upcoming challenges as the government aims to decarbonize the power system by 2030. He underscored the complexity of the current energy market, noting that neither Ofgem nor any other entity could entirely prevent future issues that may impact consumers.
Brearley concluded by asserting the importance for the regulator to have the authority to identify and seek compensation when considerable customer harm is identified.