LONDON DAILY ARCHIVE
Musicians Unite Against AI Copyright Proposals with Silent Album
Over 1,000 artists, including Kate Bush and Annie Lennox, release a silent album to protest changes to UK copyright law affecting AI training.
25 February 2025 · 06:50 UTC

This release serves as a protest against proposed changes to UK copyright law that would facilitate the training of artificial intelligence (AI) models on copyrighted materials without requiring licenses.
The proposed changes introduce an exemption to existing copyright regulations, allowing tech companies to use copyrighted content for AI training unless artists actively opt out.
Musicians argue that this would undermine the creative sector by enabling AI to replicate and reproduce their work without adequate compensation, potentially leading to a long-term displacement of artists.
The silent album features recordings of empty studios and performance spaces, which the artists assert would reflect the future landscape of the music industry should the government enact the proposed legislation.
This move coincides with the conclusion of a government consultation period on the matter.
The album's track listing emphasizes the collective disapproval of the proposals, articulating the message: “The British government must not legalise music theft to benefit AI companies.” The release includes contributions from a variety of musicians, ranging from renowned figures like Billy Ocean and The Clash to composers, conductors, and producers, many of whom have received prestigious accolades such as Oscars and Grammys.
Ed Newton-Rex, the lead organizer behind the project, criticized the government’s plans, arguing they would allow AI companies to exploit the efforts of musicians without due remuneration.
He emphasized that a robust framework for AI development need not sacrifice the integrity of the UK's thriving creative industries.
In recent reports, it was noted that the UK music sector contributed £7.6 billion to the national economy in 2023, with music exports reaching £4.6 billion.
Support for the protest against the proposals has garnered attention from other prominent figures in the industry, including Sir Elton John and Simon Cowell, with Sir Paul McCartney also voicing opposition.
While some AI companies have begun securing licenses for content, many established AI models have been developed using data harvested from public internet sources, which has provoked outcry from various creative sectors, including publishing.
Dan Conway, the chief executive of the Publishers Association, expressed concern over the proposed changes, highlighting the necessity for the government to heed the broad support from distinguished creators advocating for copyright protections.
With the publishing industry contributing £11 billion to the UK economy, Conway noted that it plays an integral role in the overall growth of creative sectors and the adoption of AI technologies.
He underscored the need for transparency and fair trading practices to ensure that AI development benefits the economy and respects the rights of content creators.
The debate over AI and copyright continues, as various stakeholders from creative industries seek to protect their rights while recognizing the potential of AI technologies.