London Daily

Focus on the big picture.
Wednesday, Sep 17, 2025

Cost of living: Spiralling energy bill burden will send UK into catastrophic territory

Cost of living: Spiralling energy bill burden will send UK into catastrophic territory

Grim budget forecasts for struggling households imply widespread destitution and an economic winter of the kind we have not ever seen outside of war.

We have never seen anything like this.

The UK has been through all sorts of ups and downs (sadly more of the latter than the former) in recent years.

There was the financial crisis of 2008 and the recession that followed, a lost decade of stagnating real wages and productivity, Brexit and of course the COVID-19 pandemic and its associated lockdowns.


Each of these events constituted a big economic moment, but none of them will prepare us for what we are about to experience this winter.

Because energy crises are simply different.

This time around it is not the financial plumbing that has broken but the most important forces in all our lives: heat and power.

Energy is such an important, ubiquitous part of the economy that, as with many other important, ubiquitous things like air and water, we usually take it for granted.

But this crisis is one of those moments where we are being forced to pay attention.

Nearly all economic activity is, one way or another, a form of energy transfer.

The implications are enormous


Most economic output depends, somewhere along the line, on energy, whether it's the power for your computer or the natural gas and coal we burn when we make glass or steel (or silicon chips).

All roads lead you back eventually to energy in all its guises.

So when the price of that ubiquitous, essential force goes up like it has done recently, the implications are enormous.

This is not a UK-specific issue; every country around the world is grappling with this challenge - European nations most of all - but Britain's slightly odd way of setting domestic prices means it provides a stark example of the scale of the issue.

The system works roughly as follows: every six months the regulator, Ofgem, looks at wholesale prices, runs them through its model which allows for some extra costs including the legacy of expensive renewables and a small margin for suppliers, and sets an average unit price for gas and electricity.

Those prices are most often announced in the form of a "household average" based on typical usage.



Last time the cap was announced the average was £1,971; now Ofgem has announced it would go up to £3,549 from the start of October.

However, these bare numbers only tell you so much.

So the best place to look next is at typical household spending and to see what those kinds of numbers mean as a proportion of our typical outlay.

Part of the reason many of us take energy for granted is that it has been relatively cheap in recent decades - though the word "relative" is important here: for some families, energy costs have long been a serious burden.

Still, averages are the simplest measure we have here, and the average amount households paid for heating their home and providing electricity between 2000 and 2020 was about 3.9% of their total spending.

Things start to look grisly


This was low in both historical and relative terms: between 1957 and 1987 the proportion we spent on heat and power was just over 6%.

But factor in the latest increases in the price cap and things start to look grisly.

The proportion we spend on heat and power has been creeping up in recent years, up to around 6% in the middle of this year - when the price cap hit £1,971.

This was the highest household "energy burden", as we might call it, since the mid-1980s.

This level, it's worth saying, has already been responsible for increasing the number of people in fuel poverty considerably, as well as the number of people in arrears on their utility bills.

But the October increase will push the energy bill burden up to 10.5% of typical expenditure.

This would be comfortably the highest level since comparable records began in 1957.

To put it into perspective, it is about the same as we currently spend on food and drinks, though of course they are also going up in price (in large part due to high energy costs - you see, all roads lead back to energy).


Now, the government has introduced a set of measures to help: there is a £400 grant for all households, a council tax rebate of £150 for most households and an extra £650 for those on means-tested benefits (as well as grants for pensioners and those on disability benefits).

At the time, this was a genuinely generous package, costing over £30bn.

However, even once you factor this into our calculations, the average household will still face energy bills of 6.9% of their total spending.

This would be the highest level ever - albeit lower than that 10.5% it would've been without government help.

The problem, however, is that this is highly unlikely to be the end of it.

It's extremely hard to predict the future course of wholesale gas prices, but based on where futures markets are pointing now, Cornwall Insight, an analyst, thinks the price cap would exceed £5,000 when it is next calculated in November (the cap will be revised every three months from then - a procedural switch being introduced by Ofgem at the worst possible time).

It would go above £6,000 in the spring, based on current trends.

This is beyond implausible


Given the energy bill burden is already going to be at a historic high in October, it goes without saying that these future increases would take us towards catastrophic territory.

At those kinds of levels, the average household would have to pay about a fifth of their household budgets on energy bills.

Poorer households would have it even worse: my slightly rough-and-ready calculations suggest that even after those generous government grants about 40% of their spending would have to go on gas and electricity.

This is beyond implausible.

It would imply widespread destitution and an economic winter of the kind we have not ever seen outside of war.

All of which is why it seems implausible that the next prime minister, be it Liz Truss or Rishi Sunak, will not intervene, and intervene big, this winter.


This moment feels not unlike the days and weeks before the announcement of the furlough scheme in early 2020: the UK was heading towards a lockdown yet the government had yet to announce extensive support, save for a few small-scale schemes.

In the end, it delivered the single biggest intervention in post-war history.

The furlough scheme ended up costing more than £50bn a year - and had enormously far-reaching consequences we are all very familiar with.

That brings us to the current situation.

The government has already committed around £30bn to energy bills.

Mr Sunak and Ms Truss have both outlined schemes which will involve the distribution of a few more billions of pounds of support.

This is unlikely, given the scale of what we've discussed above, to be enough.

It would not prevent widespread increases in fuel poverty, and a very deep recession.

Sir Keir Starmer has suggested a more radical policy: freeze the energy price cap where it is now, at £1,971.

This would certainly prevent a sharp increase in fuel poverty and many economists think the eventual prime minister will have to go for something similar.

But how much would it cost?

A rough and ready calculation suggests the following.

This is big stuff, with enormous consequences


With the energy price cap at £3,549 (in other words where it will be as of 1 October) it will cost around £40bn.

If the price cap goes up in line with Cornwall Insights' projections and exceeds £6,000 next spring, it will cost a whopping £120-130bn.

It would be more than twice the scale of the furlough scheme, sending the UK's national debt up well above 100% of GDP.

In short, this is big stuff, with enormous consequences.

And we haven't even got on to the consequences for businesses, which are doubly important here since if businesses start collapsing in droves then that also means the collapse of earnings for many families around the country.

Now, much of the above (including those costings) depends on what happens next with energy prices.

It's quite possible that after the current spike, gas and electricity prices (which are being kept high by a combination of factors, most obviously Russia's invasion of Ukraine) could moderate.

Then again, it's also plausible that Europe loses Russian gas altogether this winter, which would likely push gas prices even higher than their current levels.

It would be grisly for all concerned.

An everything crisis


The UK can at least comfort itself that it is slightly more insulated against the possibility of running out of gas than, for instance, Germany.

But if there is a cold snap it's anyone's guess what happens next.

It is all rather depressing, but this is the logic of energy.

An energy crisis, as I've said quite a few times in the past year, is an everything crisis.

We are starting to find out what that means.

Newsletter

Related Articles

0:00
0:00
Close
Hong Kong Industry Group Calls for HK$20 Billion Support Fund to Ease Property Market Stress
Joe Biden’s Post-Presidency Speaking Fees Face Weak Demand amid Corporate Reluctance
Charlie Kirk's murder will break the left's hateful cancel tactics
Kash Patel erupts at ‘buffoon’ Sen. Adam Schiff over Russiagate: ‘You are the biggest fraud’
Homeland Security says Emmy speech ‘fanning the flames of hatred’ after Einbinder’s ‘F— ICE’ remark
Charlie Kirk’s Alleged Assassin Tyler Robinson Faces Death Penalty as Charges Formally Announced
Actor, director, environmentalist Robert Redford dies at 89
The conservative right spreads westward: a huge achievement for 'Alternative for Germany' in local elections
JD Vance Says There Is “No Unity” with Those Who Celebrate Charlie Kirk’s Killing, and he is right!
Trump sues the 'New York Times' for an astronomical sum of 15 billion dollars
Florida Hospital Welcomes Its Largest-Ever Baby: Annan, Nearly Fourteen Pounds at Birth
U.S. and Britain Poised to Finalize Over $10 Billion in High-Tech, Nuclear and Defense Deals During Trump State Visit
China Finds Nvidia Violated Antitrust Laws in Mellanox Deal, Deepens Trade Tensions with US
US Air Force Begins Modifications on Qatar-Donated Jet Amid Plans to Use It as Air Force One
Pope Leo Warns of Societal Crisis Over Mega-CEO Pay, Citing Tesla’s Proposed Trillion-Dollar Package
Poland Green-Lights NATO Deployment in Response to Major Russian Drone Incursion
Elon Musk Retakes Lead as World’s Richest After Brief Ellison Surge
U.S. and China Agree on Framework to Shift TikTok to American Ownership
London Daily Podcast: London Massive Pro Democracy Rally, Musk Support, UK Economic Data and Premier League Results Mark Eventful Weekend
This Week in AI: Meta’s Superintelligence Push, xAI’s Ten Billion-Dollar Raise, Genesis AI’s Robotics Ambitions, Microsoft Restructuring, Amazon’s Million-Robot Milestone, and Google’s AlphaGenome Update
Le Pen Tightens the Pressure on Macron as France Edges Toward Political Breakdown
Musk calls for new UK government at huge pro-democracy rally in London, but Britons have been brainwashed to obey instead of fighting for their human rights
Elon Musk responds to post calling for the murder of Erika Kirk, widow of Charlie Kirk: 'Either we fight back or they will kill us'
Czech Republic signs €1.34 billion contract for Leopard 2A8 main battle tanks with delivery from 2028
USA: Office Depot Employees Refused to Print Poster in Memory of Charlie Kirk – and Were Fired
Proposed U.S. Bill Would Allow Civil Suits Against Judges Who Release Repeat Violent Offenders
Penske Media Sues Google Over “AI Overviews,” Claiming It Uses Journalism Without Consent and Destroys Traffic
Indian Student Engineers Propose “Project REBIRTH” to Protect Aircraft from Crashes Using AI, Airbags and Smart Materials
French Debt Downgrade Piles Pressure on Macron’s New Prime Minister
US and UK Near Tech, Nuclear and Whisky Deals Ahead of Trump Trip
One in Three Europeans Now Uses TikTok, According to the Chinese Tech Giant
Could AI Nursing Robots Help Healthcare Staffing Shortages?
NATO Deploys ‘Eastern Sentry’ After Russian Drones Violate Polish Airspace
Anesthesiologist Left Operation Mid-Surgery to Have Sex with Nurse
Tens of Thousands of Young Chinese Get Up Every Morning and Go to Work Where They Do Nothing
The New Life of Novak Djokovic
The German Owner of Politico Mathias Döpfner Eyes Further U.S. Media Expansion After Axel Springer Restructuring
Suspect Arrested: Utah Man in Custody for Charlie Kirk’s Fatal Shooting
In a politically motivated trial: Bolsonaro Sentenced to 27 Years for Plotting Coup After 2022 Defeat
German police raid AfD lawmaker’s offices in inquiry over Chinese payments
Turkish authorities seize leading broadcaster amid fraud and tax investigation
Volkswagen launches aggressive strategy to fend off Chinese challenge in Europe’s EV market
ChatGPT CEO signals policy to alert authorities over suicidal youth after teen’s death
The British legal mafia hit back: Banksy mural of judge beating protester is scrubbed from London court
Surpassing Musk: Larry Ellison becomes the richest man in the world
Embarrassment for Starmer: He fired the ambassador photographed on Epstein’s 'pedophile island'
Manhunt after 'skilled sniper' shot Charlie Kirk. Footage: Suspect running on rooftop during panic
Effective Protest Results: Nepal’s Prime Minister Resigns as Youth-Led Unrest Shakes the Nation
Qatari prime minister says Netanyahu ‘killed any hope’ for Israeli hostages
King Charles and Prince Harry Share First In-Person Moment in 19 Months
×