Biden ״to propose״ minimum tax on billionaires as part of 2023 budget (believe what he do, not what he say)
Biden is trying to save the fall of his popularity by promising things he is unable and does not intend to keep. Today he promotes a plan would set a 20% minimum tax rate on households worth more than $100 million. 20% from what? If they officially earn nothing, 20% of nothing is nothing…
U.S. President Joe Biden will propose a minimum tax on billionaires as part of the fiscal 2023 budget that is expected to be unveiled on Monday, a document released by the White House showed.
Biden's "Billionaire Minimum Income Tax" would set a 20% minimum tax rate on households worth more than $100 million, in a plan that would mostly target the United States' more than 700 billionaires, according to a White House fact sheet released on Saturday.
The plan would require such households to pay the minimum tax of 20% on all of their income including unrealized investment income that is now untaxed, the fact sheet said.
The tax will help reduce the budget deficit by about $360 billion in the next decade, the fact sheet added.
Senate Democrats last autumn had proposed a billionaires tax to help pay for Biden's social and climate-change known as "Build Back Better" although the spending package did not move forward due to insufficient support in the Senate.
Biden's "Billionaire Minimum Income Tax" would set a 20% minimum tax rate on households worth more than $100 million, in a plan that would mostly target the United States' more than 700 billionaires, according to a White House fact sheet released on Saturday.
The plan would require such households to pay the minimum tax of 20% on all of their income including unrealized investment income that is now untaxed, the fact sheet said.
The tax will help reduce the budget deficit by about $360 billion in the next decade, the fact sheet added.
Senate Democrats last autumn had proposed a billionaires tax to help pay for Biden's social and climate-change known as "Build Back Better" although the spending package did not move forward due to insufficient support in the Senate.
